Back

Functional definition of the Drosophila airway progenitor field through overlapping compensatory regulators

Matsuda, R.; Hosono, C.; Saigo, K.; Samkovlis, C.

2026-03-20 developmental biology
10.64898/2026.03.18.712720 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Tubular organs present a common solution to fluid transport in multicellular organisms. They often arise by an initial bulging of flat epithelial progenitor cells, which then undergo branching morphogenesis. Here, we present 3 cooperative programs fully defining the Drosophila airway progenitor field and their roles in early morphogenesis linking the radial pattern of the 2-dimensional (2D) field to the proximo-distally patterning of the 3D tubes. We previously showed that extrinsic Hedgehog (Hh) and intrinsic POU-Homeobox TF Ventral-veinless (Vvl)/Drifter/U-turn dominantly drive the transcriptional program toward the distal airway cell identity at the expense of a proximal program specified by the GATA TF grain (grn). Both programs require the basic-HLH-POU TF trachealess (trh) (Matsuda et. al, 2015). Whereas trh is not essential for primordia invagination, we show that in hh vvl double mutants, the oval-shaped primordia frequently remain at the 2D plane, retaining trh expression in a grn dependent manner. Therefore, hh and vvl are the principal regulators of progenitor invagination independent of trh. Each of the 3 regulators, Trh, Vvl and Grn fulfills only complementary or compensatory functions in transcription and morphogenesis but their combinations functionally define the airway progenitor field. We further provide a comprehensive description for allocating the airway progenitors on the body coordinates, involving dorsal Decapentaplegic/BMP signaling along the dorso-ventral axis and subsequent radial EGFR signaling along the proximo-distal axis. The presence of 3 complementary, regulatory programs in early gene expression and morphogenesis of the simple Drosophila airways may reflect the vital needs for respiration, and their influence on the evolution of various strategies in tubular organ development.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
2
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.2%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 7%
9.1%
4
Developmental Biology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.3%
5
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.3%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.9%
8
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 18%
2.7%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.4%
10
EMBO reports
136 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
11
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.1%
12
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 33%
1.7%
14
Molecular Biology of the Cell
272 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
16
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
17
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Journal of Cell Science
353 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Life Science Alliance
263 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
22
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
23
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.7%