Differentiable Gene Set Enrichment Analysis for Pathway-Level Supervision in Transcriptomic Learning
Li, S.; Ruan, Y.; Yang, X.; Wen, Z.; Saigo, H.
Show abstract
In transcriptomics-driven drug discovery, upstream predictors of chemical-induced transcriptional profiles (CTPs) are typically trained with gene-wise objectives, whereas downstream interpretation relies on pathway-level, rank-based statistics such as Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA). This objective mismatch destabilizes pathway conclusions under prediction errors: small ranking perturbations can flip enrichment direction or distort pathway ordering. To bridge this gap, we present differentiable GSEA (dGSEA), a training-compatible surrogate that maps predicted gene-level scores to pathway enrichment with well-behaved gradients. Technically, dGSEA replaces discrete ranking operations with temperature-controlled soft sorting, smooth prefix accumulation, and differentiable extremum aggregation. Critically, to preserve the statistical semantics of classical GSEA, we introduce sign-specific robust permutation normalization (dNES) with optional{kappa} -calibration. For computational efficiency, a scalable Nystrom-window approximation (nyswin) reduces the quadratic bottleneck to near-linear complexity, enabling genome-scale evaluation. Empirically, across synthetic benchmarks and LINCS L1000 signatures, dGSEA matches classical GSEA accuracy with improved numerical stability. When incorporated as an auxiliary objective for SMILES-to-transcriptome prediction, dGSEA improves pathway-level agreement (macro correlation 0.257 [->] 0.306; sign accuracy 0.620 [->] 0.641) without compromising gene-level performance, providing a practical mechanism for pathway-aware optimization in transcriptomic prediction pipelines.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- ML-MAGES: A machine learning framework for multivariate genetic association analyses with genes and effect size shrinkage 94%
- Joint imputation and deconvolution of gene expression across spatial transcriptomics platforms 94%
- Assessing transcriptomic re-identification risks using discriminative sequence models 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.