Back

A history of symbiosis impacts the host evolutionary trajectory in experimentally evolved amoebas

Jahan, I.; Larsen, T. J.; Strassmann, J. E.; Queller, D. C.

2026-03-20 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.03.18.712585 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Biological diversity driven by endosymbiosis arises from the intertwined evolution of microbes and their hosts. Each partner affects the fitness and therefore the evolution of the other. Here, we tested a further question: does the history of symbiosis affect evolution even after the partnership is dissolved? We analyzed phenotypic data from experimentally evolved strains of Dictyostelium discoideum hosts, each of which had had its symbiont removed, to study how their traits evolved. We found that host trait evolution was affected by the prior history of infection, specifically by which of three Paraburkolderia bacterial symbionts had been removed. Thus, symbionts affect not only current evolution but also generate path dependence that affects the subsequent evolutionary trajectories even after the symbionts are lost. Impact statementThe evolution of partner dependence in host-microbial symbioses has fundamentally shaped biological diversity and ecosystem function. To examine variation in symbiont dependence in the social amoeba, we compared how different strains of Dictyostelium discoideum respond evolutionarily after the loss of their bacterial symbionts. We analyzed phenotypic data from experimentally evolved strains and found that the absence of different symbiont species leads to distinct changes in the subsequent evolution of key traits like cell proliferation, slug migration, and spore production. This research expands our current understanding of microbial symbiosis by revealing that symbiont species may impact the evolution of their hosts even after the symbiont is gone. Data summaryWe used phenotypic traits data from our previous experimental-evolution dataset from the open-access repository Dryad (https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.kkwh70s97). Scripts for the statistical analyses are available in a GitHub repository (https://github.com/jahanisrat/SymbiontLoss). The accompanying R project includes code to reproduce the graphs in the results section.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.8%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 6%
9.8%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.2%
4
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.1%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.7%
6
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.7%
7
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
8
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.2%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
10
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.5%
11
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.5%
12
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.0%
13
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
14
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
15
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.0%
16
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.0%
17
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
18
Cell Host & Microbe
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
19
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.0%
20
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
21
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
22
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.2%
24
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
25
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
26
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
27
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.7%
28
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 26%
0.7%
29
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
30
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%