Back

Predicting Individualized Functional Topography in Developmental Prosopagnosia

Abenes, I.; Jiahui, G.

2026-03-20 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.03.18.712539 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Functional localizer scans have long served as the classic method for mapping individualized functional topographies, but they require dedicated scan time and can be difficult to implement in neuropsychological populations. Previous work has shown that individualized functional topographies can be estimated with high fidelity in typical participants using hyperalignment, but it remains unknown whether this approach generalizes to populations with functional deficits. Here, we tested this question in developmental prosopagnosia (DP), a neuropsychological condition characterized by severe face recognition impairments. Using two independent datasets that included both DP and control participants, we estimated individualized category-selective functional topographies from independent participants using hyperalignment derived from either a task-based scan or a naturalistic movie-viewing scan. Across datasets, whole-brain correlations and searchlight analyses showed that predicted topographies were highly similar to topographies estimated from participants own localizer data, especially in cortical areas with strong category-selective responses. Hyperalignment successfully recovered idiosyncratic features of category-selective topographies and consistently outperformed anatomical alignment. Importantly, predictions generalized across groups, such that individualized topographies in DPs could be estimated from control participants and vice versa. In addition, predicted topographies preserved the reduced face selectivity in DPs previously reported in the literature. These findings support a hyperalignment-based framework for estimating individualized functional topographies in neuropsychological populations without requiring separate localizer scans, and provide a foundation for integrating existing datasets to study the underlying neural basis in DP and other atypical populations.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
22.6%
2
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.1%
3
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.8%
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.4%
5
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 14%
4.9%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.3%
8
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 11%
3.3%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
11
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
12
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
13
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.5%
14
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
15
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
16
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
17
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
81 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
18
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
19
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.9%
20
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
22
Neurobiology of Language
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
24
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
26
Brain Structure and Function
83 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%