Back

Grasp: A Plant Transformation-Independent Crispr-Based System For Affinity Purification Of Specific Chromatin Loci

Devillars, A.; Farinati, S.; Soria Garcia, A. F.; Joseph, J.; Gabelli, G.; Zenoni, S.; Bertini, E.; Amato, A.; Potlapalli, B. P.; Houben, A.; Palumbo, F.; Barcaccia, G.; Vannozzi, A.

2026-03-18 molecular biology
10.64898/2026.03.18.712347 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Chromatin organization regulates genome stability and gene expression by controlling DNA accessibility to transcription factors and regulatory complexes. DNA-protein interactions are commonly investigated using chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP), which relies on specific antibodies often involving technically demanding protocols. CRISPR-Cas technologies have enabled sequence-specific targeting of genomic loci using catalytically inactive Cas9 (dCas9), but most CRISPR-based chromatin capture approaches in plants require transient or stable transformation to express the CRISPR machinery, limiting their applicability across species, tissues and physiological contexts. Here, we present GRASP (Genomic Region Affinity Sequestration by CRISPR-Purification), a transformation-independent strategy for sequence-specific chromatin isolation operating directly on purified plant nuclei. In GRASP, dCas9-gRNA ribonucleoprotein complexes are used to capture predefined genomic regions from chromatin under native conditions, bypassing the need for transgene expression. Using grapevine and tomato as model systems, we demonstrate efficient and highly specific enrichment of target loci, including telomeric repeats as well as low-copy and single-copy genomic regions, with qPCR and NGS validation. These results establish GRASP as a robust and broadly applicable platform for locus-specific chromatin isolation in plants. Beyond sequence-specific DNA isolation, GRASP establishes a versatile platform for potential downstream analyses of locus-associated chromatin components, including protein complexes, distal DNA-DNA interactions and chromatin-associated RNAs, providing new opportunities to investigate regulatory architecture in plant genomes. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=79 SRC="FIGDIR/small/712347v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (24K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@13758e8org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@adfd82org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@de81f4org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@25c2d3_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
2
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
3
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 1%
10.4%
4
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.4%
6
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.9%
7
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
8
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.4%
9
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 42%
1.7%
10
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
11
Nature Plants
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
13
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
14
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
15
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.2%
16
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.0%
17
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
18
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.7%
19
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
20
Protein & Cell
25 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
23
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%