Back

From Single-Cell Emergent Behaviors to Clinical Outcome: PTEN-driven Migratory Efficiency as a Potential New Vulnerability in Glioblastoma

Morelli, M.; Ferri, G.; Lessi, F.; Franceschi, S.; Marchetto, F.; Di Lorenzo, F.; Tancreda, G.; Vadi, T.; Sarnari, F.; Hohmann, T.; Pieri, F.; Gambacciani, C.; Pasqualetti, F.; Shah, Y.; Singh, J.; West, B.; Menicagli, M.; Giacomarra, M.; Tonello, L.; Aretini, P.; Geraci, F.; Pastore, A.; Santonocito, O. S.; Di Stefano, A. L.; Grigolini, P.; Palatella, L.; Mazzanti, C. M.

2026-03-20 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.03.18.712310 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundGlioblastoma (GB) is a highly aggressive brain tumor with a median survival of approximately 14 months, primarily due to its ability to infiltrate healthy brain tissue both as single cells and in collectives. A deeper understanding of GB cell motility, both individual and collective, is crucial for developing patient-specific therapies. We aimed to characterize migration in patient-derived GB cells using advanced modeling to identify stratification markers and therapeutic vulnerabilities. MethodsWe developed Single-Cell Behavior Live Imaging (ScBLI), an approach integrating live imaging with computational analysis, applied to 30 GB primary cell cultures. Trajectories and morphological features were tracked and analyzed. Diffusion Entropy Analysis (DEA) was applied to classify trajectories based on the Delta Scaling parameter ({delta} scaling). We evaluated functional responses correlating all findings with clinical outcomes and transcriptomic profiles. ResultsWe analyzed 4,279 cell trajectories. Based on {delta} scaling (range 0.28-0.837), we defined three distinct motility groups: Low (L, {delta} scaling [&le;]0.5), Medium (M, 0.5 < {delta} scaling [&le;] 0.7), and High (H, {delta} scaling >0.7). Functional assays demonstrated that Group H cells are more performant in both positive and negative chemotaxis. Clinically, the three groups showed a clear linear progression with patient survival: High {delta} scaling correlated with the shortest survival (poorer prognosis), while Low {delta} correlated with the longest survival, suggesting that structured motility drives invasiveness. Integrative multi-omic analysis, encompassing both exome and transcriptome profiling, demonstrated that these groups are defined by distinct molecular landscapes rather than poor behavioral traits. Moreover, exome data revealed that Group H is significantly enriched in PTEN alterations (75% vs. 8% in Group L), with PTEN gain-of-function (GoF) mutations exclusively restricted to this group (100% vs 0% in Group L). Notably, within our extended cohort (n=51) currently characterized by whole-exome sequencing, we observed that specific PTEN GoF mutations were associated with a significantly shorter survival compared to PTEN wild-type cases (median OS 6.4 vs 16.6 months; p=0.02), which typically harbor the canonical loss of chromosome 10q. A similar clinical trend was observed when comparing directly GoF carriers to patients with truncating (Ter) alterations (median OS 6.4 vs 14.3 months; p=0.09). Conversely, no survival difference was found between truncating (Ter) mutations and wild-type cases. ConclusionOur findings demonstrate for the first time that migratory efficiency, quantified through DEA, represents a powerful predictor of glioblastoma aggressiveness. Tumor cells adopting highly efficient exploration strategies are strongly associated with poor clinical outcomes and are characterized by distinct molecular signatures, notably PTEN gain-of-function alterations. Statement of significanceOur multi-scale computational framework elucidates emergent behavioral phenotypes as pivotal drivers of glioblastoma progression. By demonstrating a correlation between enhanced migratory efficiency, PTEN gain-of-function, and significantly reduced overall survival, we establish a foundational paradigm for deciphering the emergent complexity governing tumor invasiveness.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neuro-Oncology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.2%
2
Neuro-Oncology Advances
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.0%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 10%
8.3%
4
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.9%
5
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
6
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
3.0%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
9
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
10
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
11
Acta Neuropathologica Communications
81 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.3%
12
Neoplasia
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
13
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
15
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
16
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
17
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
Cancer Letters
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
19
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
20
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.9%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 54%
0.9%
23
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
24
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
25
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
27
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.8%
28
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
29
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
30
Molecular Cancer
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%