Back

Context-dependent determinants of CRISPR-Cas9 editing efficiency revealed through cross-species endogenous editing analysis

Cohen, S.; Bergman, S.; Burghardt, M.; Menuhin-Gruman, I.; Eyal, E.; Arbel, N.; Emmanuel, E.; Kapel, M.; Rabinovich, L.; Avital, G.; Maoz, A.; Avitzour, M.; Bogen, M.; Orenstein, Y.; Rahimi, M.; Yaish, O.; Veksler-Lublinsky, I.; Cohen, L.; Malul, T.; Mayrose, I.; Rice, A.; Landau, E.; Burstein, D.; Arias, O.; Gertz, D.; Kutchinsky, O.; Aharoni, A.; Li, D.; Parnas, O.; Mol Jaya Prakashan, M.; Shovman, Y.; Izhiman, T.; Kunis, G.; Wiener, A.; Barhum, Y.; Steinberg Shemer, O.; Izraeli, S.; Birger, Y.; Markovich, O.; Furest, D.; Moshkovitz, S.; Yahalom, A.; Dominissini, D.; Brezinger-Dayan, K.; J.

2026-03-18 synthetic biology
10.64898/2026.03.18.712093 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Accurate prediction of CRISPR-Cas9 guide RNA (gRNA) editing efficiency remains limited, particularly outside human systems, where models trained on exogenous human datasets show poor generalization. We analyzed Cas9 efficiency and repair outcomes using novel endogenous editing data from four human cell types, two tomato cell types, and cells from giant river prawn and black soldier fly. While integrating publicly available predictors via ensemble frameworks improved performance, our analysis revealed hundreds of novel features affecting activity. Crucially, dominant features related to sites competition for gRNA, and local geometric properties varied across systems, highlighting the strong context dependence of Cas9 efficiency and arguing against a universal model. Interestingly, codon usage bias-based features also emerged as informative predictors, as they are proxies for chromatin accessibility. In contrast, trends in repair outcomes remained conserved. This work provides essential resources for more generalizable CRISPR guide design.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
52.7%
50% of probability mass above
2
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 1%
10.2%
3
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
4
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
5
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.9%
6
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.8%
7
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.8%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.7%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.7%
10
The CRISPR Journal
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
11
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.5%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 64%
1.3%
14
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.2%
15
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
16
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
17
Molecular Therapy
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
18
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
19
Nature Chemical Biology
104 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
20
Molecular Systems Biology
142 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.7%
22
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.7%
23
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
24
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.5%