Back

Sertad4 regulates pathological cardiac remodeling.

Francois, A.; Bermeo-Blanco, O.; Thong Nguyen, B.; Marcho, L. M.; Elbon, A.; Ambardekar, A. V.; Zhang, Y.; Gumina, R. J.; Stratton, M.

2026-03-20 physiology
10.64898/2026.03.18.708586 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cardiac fibrosis driven by persistent myofibroblast activation is a major contributor to adverse ventricular remodeling and heart failure. Bromodomain and extra-terminal domain (BET) inhibition reduces fibrosis and hypertrophy in preclinical models, but direct targeting of the BET co-activator BRD4 is limited by family homology and potential systemic toxicity. Sertad4 (SERTA domain containing protein 4) is a BRD4-dependent gene induced in activated cardiac fibroblasts, yet its role in cardiac pathology is unknown. Here, we examined Sertad4 expression and function in human heart failure and in murine myocardial infarction (MI). SERTAD4 protein was increased in left ventricular tissue from heart failure patients compared with non-failing controls. In Sertad4/LacZ reporter mice, MI triggered strong Sertad4 activation localized to the infarct scar and border zone, with minimal expression in remote myocardium; single-nucleus RNA sequencing further demonstrated that Sertad4 expression is predominantly fibroblast-restricted and significantly upregulated after MI. To test causality, we subjected global Sertad4 knockout mice to 28-day left anterior descending coronary artery ligation. Sertad4 deletion attenuated post-MI remodeling, reduced hypertrophy and ventricular dilation, and preserved systolic function. Consistent with improved structure and function, knockout hearts exhibited reduced cardiomyocyte cross-sectional area and decreased expression of fibrosis and hypertrophy associated genes. Together, these findings identify Sertad4 as a fibroblast enriched regulator of pathological remodeling and suggest that targeting Sertad4 may offer a more cell type-selective alternative to direct BET/BRD4 inhibition for limiting cardiac fibrosis and progression to heart failure

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
39.4%
2
Circulation Research
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
3
Nature Cardiovascular Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.9%
5
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 8%
3.7%
6
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
7
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 32%
2.6%
9
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 21%
2.1%
10
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
12
Cardiovascular Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
13
Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
14
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.9%
16
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
17
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
52 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
18
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
19
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
20
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
21
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 76%
0.7%
22
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 23%
0.6%