Back

Associations between Chronic Stress, Resilience Resources, and Cardiovascular Health among Young Adults in Puerto Rico: the PR-OUTLOOK study

Rosal, M. C.; Person, S. D.; Kiefe, C. I.; Tucker, K. L.; Perez, C. M.

2026-03-20 public and global health
10.64898/2026.03.18.26348758 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Cardiovascular outcomes for young adults, particularly Latino individuals, have worsened, in contrast with trends for older persons. Stress and psychosocial resilience resources have been associated with cardiovascular health (CVH) among middle-aged and older adults, but these associations have not been characterized in young adults and Latino populations. We examined the association between chronic stress, resilience resources, and CVH in PR-OUTLOOK, a large community cohort study of 18-29 year olds residing in Puerto Rico. Methods: Participants (n=2,676; 61.9% female) were assessed between September 2020 and March 2024. The American Heart Association Life?s Essential 8 (LE8), derived from surveys, laboratory assays, and physical examinations (range: 0-100, suboptimal CVH = <80) measured CVH. Surveys assessed chronic stress and resilience resources (optimism, religiosity, spirituality, and social support). Multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for age, sex, marital status, subjective social standing, and maternal education, examined associations between chronic stress and CVH, and the potential protective effect of resilience resources (moderation effect). With mediation analysis, using nonparametric bootstrap standard errors with 1,000 replications, we tested whether resilience factors were in the pathway of the stress-CVH association (mediation effect). Results: High chronic stress was associated with suboptimal CVH (OR=1.46; 95% CI: 1.19, 1.80) and resilience factors did not moderate this association (all p > 0.05); however, optimism and social support mediated it, accounting for 26% and 10% of the association, respectively. Conclusions: Chronic stress was associated with suboptimal CVH directly and indirectly through lower resilience resources. Longitudinal studies should better characterize these associations.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 13%
14.6%
3
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.3%
4
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.1%
7
International Journal of Obesity
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
8
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
9
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
10
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
12
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
13
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
14
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
15
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
16
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
17
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
19
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
20
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
21
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
23
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
24
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%