Back

A Field-Side Triage Model for Early Specialist Referral After Acute Lower Extremity Sports Injuries in Young Athletes: Development and Internal Validation

Sakoda, S.; Kumagae, H.; Kawano, K.

2026-03-19 sports medicine
10.64898/2026.03.18.26348754 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo develop and internally validate a field-side triage model to support early specialist referral decisions in young athletes with acute lower extremity sports injuries, where diagnostic resources are often limited. DesignRetrospective cohort study. SettingSingle-center sports medicine clinic. ParticipantsAthletes aged [≤]22 years presenting with acute lower extremity sports injuries between January 2017 and November 2025. Independent VariablesAge, sex, functional severity, injury site, and injury mechanism assessed at initial presentation. ResultsA total of 2,129 athletes were included, with 276 (13.0%) undergoing surgery. Independent predictors were older age, female sex, greater functional severity, knee involvement, and high-energy deceleration mechanisms. The full model showed good performance (AUC 0.890; Brier score 0.073; calibration slope 1.00), and the simplified model also demonstrated high discrimination (AUC 0.883). Risk stratification showed increasing surgical rates across low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. Decision curve analysis demonstrated greater net benefit than treat-all and treat-none strategies across clinically relevant thresholds. ConclusionsA field-side prediction model based on readily obtainable clinical variables demonstrated good performance for identifying young athletes at risk of requiring surgical intervention and may support early specialist referral decisions in resource-limited settings. Clinical RelevanceThis model provides a practical tool for early risk stratification using simple clinical information, supporting timely and appropriate referral decisions in field-side and initial clinical settings.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.4%
2
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.1%
3
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.9%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
7.5%
6
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.6%
7
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
9
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
10
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
11
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.4%
12
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
13
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
14
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
15
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
16
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
17
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
BMC Nephrology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
19
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
20
European Journal of Applied Physiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
21
American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%