Back

Nursing Documentation Practice and Associated Factors Among Nurses Working in Felege Hiwot Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Bahir Dar Town, North West, Ethiopia, 2025

Gebeyehu, A. E.; Alebachew, A. T.; Demsie, A. C.; Amare, A. A.; Biru, S. Z.

2026-03-20 nursing
10.64898/2026.03.18.26348682 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Nursing documentation is an essential component of nursing practice that has a potential to improve patient care outcome. Poor documentation of nursing care activities among nurses has been shown to have negative impacts on the health care quality. The aim of this study was to assess documentation practice and associated factors among nurses working in Felege Hiwot comprehensive specialized hospital from August 1 to August 30, 2025. Method: Institutional based cross sectional study design was employed. The data was checked for completeness, coded and entered in epi -data version 3.1 and analysis was made by STATA version 14. Binary logistic regression analysis was computed to assess associations of factors with documentation practice. Variables with p- value less than 0.25 in Bivariable analysis was entered to final model and P < 0.05 at 95% confidence interval was considered as statistically significant. Odds ratio was used to show strength of association. Result: Out of the 349 respondents, 209 (59.9%) were females. In this study 40.1% of nurses had good documentation practice. Educational level, MSc (AOR, 95%CI; 10.3(3.4-31.8)), attitude (AOR, 95%CI; 2.6(1.5-4.7)), number of patient care (AOR, 95%CI; 5.6(1.9-16.3)) and Knowledge (AOR< 95%CI; 3.7(2.1-6.2)) were statistically associated with documentation practice. Conclusion and recommendation: Poor documentation practice was due to the identified factors. So, it is better to put further effort toward improving documentation practice through providing training on standards of documentation and enhancing the favorable attitude of nurses toward documentation practice. Keywords: Documentation, Nursing care, nursing record of patient care.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
42.9%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.9%
3
Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.9%
5
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
6
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.3%
7
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
8
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
9
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.3%
10
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
11
Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
12
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
13
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
14
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 73%
0.8%
16
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
17
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
18
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
19
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%
20
Archives of Public Health
12 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
21
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%