Safety and tolerability of electronic cigarettes to reduce cigarette smoking: Secondary analysis from a randomized placebo-controlled trial
Dahal, S.; Talih, S.; Hrabovsky, S.; Sciamanna, C.; Livelsberger, C.; Soule, E.; Cobb, C. O.; Yingst, J.; Foulds, J.
Show abstract
Background The clinical safety profile of e-cigarette use for smoking reduction remains poorly characterized. This study compared the relative safety and tolerability of nicotine e-cigarette use with non-nicotine e-cigarettes or a non-aerosol cigarette substitute (CS) among adults interested in reducing their smoking. Methods We conducted a secondary analysis of adverse events (AEs) reported in a 6-month, double-blind RCT involving 520 participants assigned to either e-cigarettes with 0, 8, or 36 mg/mL nicotine or a CS. AEs were coded using CTCAE V4.0 and assessed for frequency, severity, seriousness and relatedness across groups. Cumulative incidence was calculated over 24 weeks. We estimated risk differences (RDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for frequently reported AEs (>=1% of participants overall) comparing e-cigarette vs. CS and nicotine versus non-nicotine e-cigarette groups. Fisher's exact test, with adjustment for multiple comparisons, was used to assess statistical significance. Results Most study-related AEs (those rated as possibly, probably, or definitely related by medical monitor) were mild in severity and none were classified as serious. At 24 weeks, cumulative incidence of first study-related AE was highest in the 36 mg/mL (37.0%) and 8 mg/mL (35.2%) e-cigarette groups, followed by 0 mg/mL (23.4%), and lowest in CS group (2.5%). E-cigarette users experienced significantly greater risks of cough (RD [95%CI]: 8.5% [5.6-11.3]), headache (RD [95%CI]: 5.4% [3.3-7.6]) and sore throat (RD [95%CI]: 5.4% [3.2-7.6]) as compared with the CS group. Cough was also more common in those randomized to nicotine versus non-nicotine e-cigarettes (RD [95%CI]: 8.1% [3.4-12.8]). Conclusion All study products were generally well-tolerated; however, AEs were more common in e-cigarette groups, especially with nicotine. Findings highlight the need to monitor common symptoms such as cough, headache, and sore throat in clinical and regulatory evaluations of e-cigarette safety.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Varenicline Versus Cytisine for Smoking Cessation in a Primary Care Setting: A Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
- Trends in daily cigarette consumption among smokers: a population study in England, 2008-2023 93%
- Artificial Sweeteners in US-Marketed Oral Nicotine Pouch Products: Correlation with Nicotine Contents and Effects on Product Preference 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- E-cigarettes With Varenicline Versus Varenicline for Smoking Cessation: A Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial 96%
- Effect of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems on Cigarette Abstinence in Smokers with no Plans to Quit: Exploratory Analysis of a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial 96%
- Associations between e-cigarette use and e-cigarette flavors with cigarette smoking quit attempts and quit success: Evidence from a US large, nationally representative 2018-2019 survey 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The effects of reduced nicotine content cigarettes in smokers with mood or anxiety disorders: a double-blind randomized trial 96%
- E-cigarette use and Respiratory Symptoms in Residents of the United States: A BRFSS Report 94%
- Investigating the added value of biomarkers compared with self-reported smoking in predicting future e-cigarette use: Evidence from a longitudinal UK cohort study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Changes in Cardiovascular Disease Risk, Lung Function, and Other Clinical Health Outcomes When People Who Smoke Use E-cigarettes to Reduce Cigarette Smoking: An Exploratory Analysis from a Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial 97%
- E-cigarette use and combustible tobacco cigarette smoking uptake among non-smokers, including relapse in former smokers: umbrella review, systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
- A factorial randomised controlled trial to examine the potential effect of a text-message based intervention on reducing adolescent susceptibility to e-cigarette use: A study protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of a Text Message Intervention Promoting Seat Belt Use Among Targeted Young Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial 91%
- Clinical Trial Evidence Supporting FDA Approval of Novel Therapeutic Agents Over Three Decades, 1995-2017: Cross-Sectional Analysis 88%
- COVID-SAFER: Deprescribing Guidance for Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir Drug Interactions in Older Adults 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.