Back

Safety and tolerability of electronic cigarettes to reduce cigarette smoking: Secondary analysis from a randomized placebo-controlled trial

Dahal, S.; Talih, S.; Hrabovsky, S.; Sciamanna, C.; Livelsberger, C.; Soule, E.; Cobb, C. O.; Yingst, J.; Foulds, J.

2026-03-20 public and global health
10.64898/2026.03.18.26348637 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background The clinical safety profile of e-cigarette use for smoking reduction remains poorly characterized. This study compared the relative safety and tolerability of nicotine e-cigarette use with non-nicotine e-cigarettes or a non-aerosol cigarette substitute (CS) among adults interested in reducing their smoking. Methods We conducted a secondary analysis of adverse events (AEs) reported in a 6-month, double-blind RCT involving 520 participants assigned to either e-cigarettes with 0, 8, or 36 mg/mL nicotine or a CS. AEs were coded using CTCAE V4.0 and assessed for frequency, severity, seriousness and relatedness across groups. Cumulative incidence was calculated over 24 weeks. We estimated risk differences (RDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for frequently reported AEs (>=1% of participants overall) comparing e-cigarette vs. CS and nicotine versus non-nicotine e-cigarette groups. Fisher's exact test, with adjustment for multiple comparisons, was used to assess statistical significance. Results Most study-related AEs (those rated as possibly, probably, or definitely related by medical monitor) were mild in severity and none were classified as serious. At 24 weeks, cumulative incidence of first study-related AE was highest in the 36 mg/mL (37.0%) and 8 mg/mL (35.2%) e-cigarette groups, followed by 0 mg/mL (23.4%), and lowest in CS group (2.5%). E-cigarette users experienced significantly greater risks of cough (RD [95%CI]: 8.5% [5.6-11.3]), headache (RD [95%CI]: 5.4% [3.3-7.6]) and sore throat (RD [95%CI]: 5.4% [3.2-7.6]) as compared with the CS group. Cough was also more common in those randomized to nicotine versus non-nicotine e-cigarettes (RD [95%CI]: 8.1% [3.4-12.8]). Conclusion All study products were generally well-tolerated; however, AEs were more common in e-cigarette groups, especially with nicotine. Findings highlight the need to monitor common symptoms such as cough, headache, and sore throat in clinical and regulatory evaluations of e-cigarette safety.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nicotine and Tobacco Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
20.2%
2
Addiction
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.2%
3
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.8%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.0%
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.1%
7
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
8
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
9
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
10
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
11
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
12
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
13
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
14
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
15
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
16
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
17
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
18
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
JAMA
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 75%
0.7%
22
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
23
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
25
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.5%