Back

Projected Burden of Bloodstream Infections and the Impact of Molecular Rapid Diagnostic Testing in England and the United States (2025-2029)

Karichu, J. K.; Pennington, M.; Lander, K.; Smith, T. T.; Thornberg, A.

2026-03-20 health economics
10.64898/2026.03.18.26348587 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction Data on bloodstream infections (BSI) indicate a growth in incidence over time. This analysis utilised national data from England and the best available United States (US) evidence to predict BSI incidence over the years 2025 to 2029. The analysis utilised evidence on the cost-effectiveness of molecular rapid diagnostic tests (mRDT) to estimate the cost and mortality associated with BSI, and the potential for increased use of mRDT to save lives. Methods Data on BSI incidence by age group and sex for England in 2017 and the US (Minnesota) for 2003 to 2005 were combined with demographic projections over the years 2025 to 2029 to estimate the number of BSIs. Published costs and mortality associated with BSI, according to the method of identification of the pathogen, were used to estimate the lives saved and the cost impact of widespread use of mRDT in England and the US. Results BSI cases in England and the US are predicted to total 1.02 million and 6.24 million over the years 2025 to 2029, associated costs are GBP14.6 million and $221 million, respectively. Expanding the use of mRDT would save 2,219 and 7,554 lives in England and the US, respectively, over a 5-year period and would reduce healthcare expenditure in both countries. Conclusion There is a compelling argument to increase the uptake of mRDT to improve patient outcomes. This analysis demonstrates that expanded mRDT adoption can significantly reduce BSI burden, saving over 9,700 lives and decreasing healthcare expenditure in both countries.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.5%
3
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
4
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.2%
6
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
7
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
9
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
10
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
11
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
12
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
14
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
15
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
17
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
18
Journal of Medical Economics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
19
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
20
Journal of Hospital Infection
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
21
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
22
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
23
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 53%
0.9%
24
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
25
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
30
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%