Back

Fitness landscapes for species interactions: when do population genetics and adaptive dynamics diverge?

Lele, K.; Uricchio, L. H.

2026-03-18 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.03.17.712462 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Multiple frameworks have been developed to investigate the evolution of species interactions on fitness landscapes, each with unique strengths and weaknesses. These include adaptive dynamics, which uses linear stability analyses to predict eco-evolutionary outcomes resulting from the invasion of rare mutants into a resident population, and population genetics, which mechanistically models finite populations and stochastic processes in finite time. Though there are some known correspondences between these frameworks, it is not clear that they will always result in the same eco-evolutionary outcomes. Moreover, while adaptive dynamics is very powerful for predicting outcomes, it is not always straightforward to relate these predictions to the data generated in experimental evolution studies. Here, we use a data-driven model of microbial species interactions to compare and contrast the predictions of population genetics and adaptive dynamics. We derive expected outcomes for one-species and two-species evolutionary trajectories by using the invasion fitness landscape concept from adaptive dynamics, and then use analytical theory and forward-in-time simulations to set these predictions within the context of population genetic models. In the context of our one-species models, we show that the timescale of evolution depends on mutation supply and effect sizes, when populations are initialized both along and off a trade-off function. For two-species competition models, we show that mutation supply, effect sizes, and asymmetries between competing species result in discrepancies between adaptive dynamics and population genetics, especially in cases where adaptive dynamics predicts stable coexistence. Our study provides insight into the role of finite timescales, mutation supplies and population sizes in the evolution of species interactions, and facilitates further research that leverages the invasion fitness landscape concept within the realm of population genetics.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.3%
2
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.6%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.0%
4
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 18%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
7
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
8
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
9
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.7%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 32%
2.6%
11
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
13
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
14
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
15
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.3%
17
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
18
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
19
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
20
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
23
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.7%
25
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
27
GENETICS
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 78%
0.6%