Binary-SPA: A Reference-Free Method for Cell Annotation in High-Resolution Spatial Transcriptomics
Ji, P.; Bi, H.; Cai, W.; Wang, P.; Ren, K.; Aydemir, I.; Li, E.; Melo-Cardenas, J.; Schipma, M.; Wai, C. M.
Show abstract
Accurate cell type annotation remains a major challenge in high-resolution spatial transcriptomics analysis. Current approaches primarily rely on label transfer from single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) reference datasets or marker-based annotation of transcriptionally defined clusters. While these methods are widely used, they have critical limitations. Label transfer approaches depend on the availability of a well-matched scRNA-seq reference. Marker-based annotation methods often suffer from accuracy and limited coverage. To address these challenges, we developed Binary-SPA, a computational framework for cell-type annotation of high-resolution spatial transcriptomics data. Binary-SPA performs annotation in two stages. First, a binary classification step identifies high-confidence cells using predefined marker sets. These confidently annotated cells are then used as an internal reference for anchor-based label transfer in the second stage. Binary-SPA outperforms conventional marker-based annotation approaches and existing label transfer methods across multiple high-resolution spatial transcriptomics platforms, preservation methods, and tissue types. While label transfer methods achieve high accuracy only when same-tissue scRNA-seq references are available, and decline substantially when relying on independent datasets, Binary-SPA matches this performance with 100% annotation coverage while eliminating the need for external reference data entirely. Binary-SPA demonstrates robust performance even in challenging specimens such as bone marrow biopsies, and validation against matched COMET protein expression data confirmed strong concordance between transcriptomic- and protein-based cell identities. Binary-SPA thus provides a robust, reference-free solution for spatial transcriptomics annotation with broad applicability to research and clinical specimens.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.