Back

Nucleotide-dependent Structural Selection Governs c-Src Phosphorylation of Oncogenic KRas4B-G12D

Lu, H.; Xu, H.; Marti, J.; Ma, B.; FARAUDO, J.

2026-03-18 biophysics
10.64898/2026.03.17.712316 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homologue (KRas) is a frequently mutated oncogene in many types of cancer and its disregulation is frequently linked to cancer progression. Phosphorylation of KRas by tyrosine kynase c-Src induces conformational changes that weakens KRas interaction with downstream effectors. It is known that c-Src preferentially recognizes and phosphorylates the GTP-bound form of KRas over its GDP-bound counterpart, but the molecular mechanism of this nucleotide-dependent selectivity remains unknown. Here, we identify the molecular mechanism underlying the c-Src recognition of the GTP-loaded state of KRas by combining extensive all-atom molecular dynamics simulations with Markov State Models analysis. In our simulations, we considered a particularly relevant KRas mutant (KRas4B-G12D, which is the most prevalent in humans) both in GDP and GTP loaded states. Our results reveal that c-Src preferentially engages the dominant macrostates of GTP-loaded KRas4B-G12D, whereas productive interactions with the GDP-bound form occur primarily through sparsely populated conformations. We identify two Src interaction regions (residues 340-359 and 453-473) that form state-dependent contacts selectively stabilizing phosphorylation-competent KRas conformations, and they are minimally engaged in other macrostates of KRas. These highly populated conformational states of GTP-loaded Kras selectively recognized by c-Src constitute privileged targets for the rational design of peptide-based or small-molecule inhibitors that specifically target active KRas4B-G12D while sparing the inactive GDP-bound form.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.