Back

Tumor-suppressor signature for robust prognosis and prediction in adenocarcinoma non-small cell lung cancer

Jiang, M.; Tan, Y.-D.

2026-03-18 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.03.17.712300 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality, partly due to limited early detection strategies and incomplete understanding of tumor-suppressive mechanisms. In our previous work, we identified 26 tumor suppressor (TS) genes and characterized their biological functions and regulatory networks. We systematically evaluated these TS genes across multiple microarray datasets by analyzing differential expression patterns, correlations with oncogenes, tumor-associated genes, and PD-1-related immune genes, as well as somatic mutation frequencies. A weighted scoring algorithm was used to construct a TS gene signature. Patients were stratified using z-score normalization, and univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were applied across multiple adenocarcinoma (ADC) cohorts. Prognostic performance was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and AUC metrics. The 26 TS genes were consistently down-regulated in tumors and showed strong negative correlations with oncogenes, particularly in advanced stages. TS genes also exhibited stage-dependent correlations with PD-1-associated immune genes, with chemotaxis/cytokine-signaling genes behaving TS-like, while PDCD1 and SIT1 showed oncogene-like patterns. Somatic mutations were detected in only 32% of LUAD samples for TS genes, compared with 68% for oncogenes. Across seven independent ADC cohorts, high TS-signature expression was associated with significantly reduced risk of death and recurrence/relapse. The TS signature outperformed several published prognostic signatures and demonstrated robust predictive accuracy, with AUC values exceeding 0.7 in multiple datasets and >0.8 for relapse prediction in GSE30219. Across seven independent cohorts, high TS signature expression was consistently associated with significantly reduced risk of death or recurrence/relapse in ADC patients. Patients with high TS signature expression exhibited markedly improved survival probabilities compared with those with low expression. When benchmarked against several established prognostic signatures using AUC metrics, our TS signature demonstrated superior robustness and predictive accuracy for ADC prognosis.

Matching journals

The top 14 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
9.9%
2
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.3%
3
Translational Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
4
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
6
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
8
Molecular Cancer
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
9
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
10
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.7%
11
Molecular Oncology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
12
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 20%
2.3%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 34%
2.3%
14
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
50% of probability mass above
15
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
16
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
17
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.5%
19
npj Systems Biology and Applications
99 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
20
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
21
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.3%
22
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
23
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
24
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
25
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
26
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
27
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
28
Cancer Letters
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
29
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
30
Cell Death & Disease
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%