Back

Broadleaved hedgerows as complementary habitats for small mammals in pine plantation landscapes

Berard, A.; Plat, N.; Pradel, J.; Galan, M.; Loiseau, A.; Piry, S.; Blanchet, J.; Cesari, L.; Berthier, K.; Rivoal, J.-B.; Pellett, C.; Valbuena, R.; Jactel, H.; Charbonnel, N.

2026-03-19 ecology
10.64898/2026.03.17.712293 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIThe global decline of natural forests is accompanied by a rapid expansion of commercial tree plantations, which are expected to further increase to meet growing demand for wood products. However, planted forests generally support lower biodiversity than natural forests, particularly when monospecific and intensively managed. In this context, broadleaved hedgerows have been proposed as a nature-based solution to enhance biodiversity within conifer-dominated plantation landscapes. Such features may be especially beneficial for small mammals, including rodents and shrews, which are key contributors to forest ecosystem functioning. However, their effects on small mammal communities remain largely unquantified. C_LIO_LIHere, we assessed variation in small mammal communities among habitat types within a native pine plantation-dominated landscape in southwestern France. Using a multi-year, multi-season survey, we compared species richness and abundance among plantation edges, broadleaved hedgerows embedded within plantations and natural broadleaved forests. We further tested whether environmental descriptors of hedgerow sites influenced dominant species and whether seasonal and interannual demographic dynamics modified habitat-related patterns. C_LIO_LIPine plantation edges and broadleaved hedgerows supported lower small mammal species richness than natural broadleaved forests and were dominated by two habitat generalists, Apodemus sylvaticus and Crocidura russula. This pattern was driven by the near absence of the forest specialist Clethrionomys glareolus. Hedgerows did not increase species richness relative to plantations, but provided favourable habitat for A. sylvaticus, which was scarce in pine plantation, while supporting fewer C. russula. Variation in hedgerow structure and composition further influenced A. sylvaticus abundance, while seasonal and interannual rodent population dynamics modulated habitat-related differences. C_LIO_LIOur results indicate that intensively managed pine plantations act as environmental filters, excluding forest-associated small mammals. While broadleaved hedgerows benefited one species, their capacity to restore forest-specialist communities was limited without broader landscape-scale interventions. These findings highlight both the ecological benefits and constraints of edge-based habitat interventions and provide guidance for designing and evaluating biodiversity-oriented management in plantation landscapes. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
39.8%
2
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
50% of probability mass above
3
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
4
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
5
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.1%
7
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
8
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
10
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
11
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
12
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
13
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.2%
15
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
16
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
17
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
18
Biodiversity and Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
19
Biotropica
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
20
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 55%
0.8%
23
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
25
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
26
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
27
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
29
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%