Back

A Surfactant Cocktail Overcomes Air-Water Interface Artifacts in Single-Particle CryoEM

Enos, S. E.; Cook, B. D.; Rahmani, H.; Narehood, S. M.; Li, Y.; Kuschnerus, I. C.; Redford, T. H.; Dukakis, P.; Ji, D.; Bachochin, M. J.; Grotjahn, D. J.; Herzik, M. A.

2026-03-18 biophysics
10.64898/2026.03.17.712260 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Single-particle cryogenic electron microscopy (cryoEM) is a widely used technique for structure determination of biomacromolecules to near-atomic resolution. Random distributions of these molecules in vitrified ice are necessary to accumulate enough two-dimensional views to generate a complete three-dimensional (3-D) reconstruction. However, interactions between the sample and the air-water interface (AWI) that occur during vitrification often bias the views of the sample, a phenomenon termed preferred orientation, limiting our ability to obtain 3-D reconstructions. Surfactants are often used as sample additives to prevent AWI-induced deterioration, but no general strategy exists for surfactant choice, requiring laborious screening for each sample. To circumvent these issues, we developed SurfACT, a cocktail of diverse surfactants with distinct physicochemical properties that limits AWI-dependent sample denaturation and orientation bias, while mitigating individual surfactant-specific drawbacks. Here we demonstrate SurfACTs effectiveness with four proteins plagued by AWI-induced issues, including two species of hemagglutinin (HA), molybdenum-iron protein (MoFeP) from the nitrogenase enzyme, and aldolase. All four samples show drastically improved viewing distribution and map completeness when SurfACT is applied. Cryogenic electron tomography demonstrates that SurfACT redistributes particles from the AWI into the bulk ice, driving signal recovery and inhibiting denaturation. This versatile sample additive minimizes sample-specific screening and expands the capabilities and range of suitable samples for cryoEM.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.7%
2
Structure
175 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.7%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 25%
7.1%
4
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.5%
5
IUCrJ
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 24%
3.7%
7
Journal of Structural Biology: X
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
8
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.2%
10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 27%
2.2%
11
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.8%
13
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
14
Microscopy and Microanalysis
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
15
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
18
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
20
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.0%
21
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
22
The Innovation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
23
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
54 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
24
Communications Chemistry
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
27
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.5%
28
Biological Imaging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
29
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
30
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%