Back

Validation of shoe sole dust as a microbial sampler reveals distinct fungal and bacterial responses to nearby vegetation

Ferdous, S. M.; Taimisto, P.; Musakka, E.; Siponen, T.; Täubel, M.; Hegarty, B.

2026-03-18 microbiology
10.64898/2026.03.17.712241 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Urbanization-driven environmental change has significant implications for human health and well-being. However, studies have found differing patterns in microbial diversity along urbanization gradients; and it remains unknown whether this reflects methodological limitations or genuine ecological complexities. Resolving these inconsistencies requires innovative, reproducible methods that accurately reflect human contact with environmental microbiota. In this study, we have validated a new method for assessing environmental microbial exposure by measuring microbiota from particulate matter collected from shoe soles and studied the influence of vegetation at different proximities. Through repeated walks on routes along an urbanization gradient in Finland, we show that left and right shoe sole dust from the same walk and same route represent more similar microbial communities compared to different walks and routes. We found that bacterial biomass and diversity were best predicted by Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI, as a measure of greenness) immediately surrounding the walking path, whereas fungal communities responded to broader landscape-scale greenness (100m-1km), suggesting that bacteria and fungi are governed by different dispersal processes. Importantly, NDVI explained these differences in diversity more effectively than simple classifications of the path based on its substrate and whether it was in a rural or urban setting. Shoe sole dust sampling offers a simple, effective, and reliable approach for evaluating microbial exposures, capturing scale-dependent microbial responses to vegetation, and enabling more robust epidemiological studies on the health effects of greenness and environmental biodiversity.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.4%
2
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
10.0%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.8%
4
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.1%
7
Indoor Air
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
9
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
10
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.9%
12
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
14
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
16
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.5%
17
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
18
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
56 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
21
Environmental Microbiome
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
22
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
23
FEMS Microbes
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
24
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
25
Environmental Microbiology Reports
27 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
26
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
27
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.6%
28
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%