Back

Development and assessment of tailored illustrations to enhance community understandings of genetics topics

Arner, A. M.; McCabe, T. C.; Seyler, A.; Zamri, S. N.; A/P Tan Boon Huat, T. B. T.; Tam, K. L.; Kinyua, P.; John, E.; Ngoci Njeru, S.; Lim, Y. A.; Gurven, M.; Nicholas, C.; Ayroles, J.; Venkataraman, V. v.; Kraft, T. S.; Wallace, I. J.; Lea, A. J.

2026-03-19 scientific communication and education
10.64898/2026.03.17.711941 bioRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesEffective communication about genetics concepts is essential for collaborative anthropological genetics research. However, communication can be challenging because many ideas are abstract and may be especially unfamiliar to communities with limited access to formal education. Indeed, there are no widely adopted models for communicating such information, nor a clear understanding of the social factors that may shape participant engagement. Here, we conducted a qualitative and quantitative, community-driven study to understand how illustrations can be useful to support concept sharing with two Indigenous groups--the Orang Asli of Peninsular Malaysia and the Turkana of Kenya. MethodsWe used a two phase approach to create and evaluate how illustrations can bolster communication about genetics concepts. First, we created images illustrating answers to frequently asked questions about genetics, iteratively updating the illustrations based on participant feedback. Second, we conducted 92 interviews to evaluate the finalized illustrations effectiveness. Finally, we analyzed the interview data using thematic analyses, multivariable modeling, and multiple correspondence analyses to identify patterns in participant understanding and feedback, including age, sex, market integration, and schooling. ResultsParticipants reported high interest in genetics research (92%) and broadly positive perceptions of the illustrations. Familiar, locally-grounded imagery was preferred and associated with greater perceived clarity, while more technical illustrations were more frequently reported as confusing. Quantitative analyses showed strong internal consistency across measures of engagement and understanding, with modest variation by degree of market-integration, schooling, and sex. DiscussionOur findings demonstrate that community-specific visualizations, co-developed through iterative feedback, can effectively support engagement with genetics research in participant communities.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.1%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 6%
23.3%
50% of probability mass above
3
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
4
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
5
American Journal of Primatology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
6
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
7
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
8
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.1%
9
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
10
BMC Research Notes
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
11
Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
12
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
13
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
14
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
15
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
16
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
17
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
18
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
19
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
22
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.5%
23
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%