Back

MuSK antibodies differently affect the MuSK signaling cascade depending on valency and epitope specificity

Vergoossen, D. L. E.; Verpalen, R.; Jensen, S. M.; Fonhof, S.; Fillie-Grijpma, Y. E.; Gstöttner, C.; Dominguez-Vega, E.; van der Maarel, S. M.; Verschuuren, J. J. G. M.; Huijbers, M. G.

2026-03-19 immunology
10.64898/2026.03.17.709302 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Muscle-specific kinase (MuSK) is a pivotal player in forming and maintaining healthy neuromuscular junctions (NMJ). In MuSK myasthenia gravis (MG), autoantibodies targeting MuSK disrupt its function, impairing neuromuscular transmission and causing fatigable skeletal muscle weakness. MuSK autoantibodies predominantly belong to the IgG4 subclass, which bind in a monovalent fashion due to Fab-arm exchange, although autoantibodies of other subclasses also exist. Polyclonal autoreactive IgG from patients may therefore harbor a variety of monovalent and bivalent MuSK antibodies with potentially distinct effects on MuSK signaling. To further unravel the pathomechanisms underlying MuSK MG, we have investigated how MuSK antibody-binding affects MuSK functioning with a diverse panel of (patient-derived) monoclonal MuSK antibodies. Our findings reveal that the valency of antibody-binding influences binding kinetics to MuSK, inhibition of agrin-induced MuSK activation, Dok7 binding to MuSK and NMJ gene expression. Monovalent binding to the frizzled domain of MuSK did not inhibit agrin-induced MuSK activation, while monovalent binding to the Ig-like domain 1 does. Moreover, the kinetics of Dok7 degradation induced by bivalent MuSK antibodies appear to depend on binding-epitope of MuSK. Surprisingly, none of the clones tested (both bivalent and monovalent) increased MuSK internalization. Taken together, the cumulative pathogenic effect of polyclonal MuSK antibodies in individual MuSK MG patients thus likely depends on autoantibody titer, affinity and the unique composition of MuSK autoantibodies varying in epitope and valency. This research enriches our understanding of the intricate interactions between antibodies and MuSK in MuSK MG and offers potential insights into novel therapeutic strategies using MuSK antibodies.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.6%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 11%
7.0%
3
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 9%
5.0%
4
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.0%
5
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.7%
6
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.5%
7
Arthritis & Rheumatology
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
8
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.1%
9
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
10
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
11
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.1%
13
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
15
Matrix Biology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
16
The Journal of Immunology
146 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
17
Journal of Biological Chemistry
641 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
18
Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
19
Muscle & Nerve
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
20
Acta Neuropathologica
51 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
21
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
22
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 37%
1.3%
24
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
25
Clinical Immunology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
26
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
27
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.9%
28
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
29
Structure
175 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
30
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%