Back

Tenecteplase versus alteplase for patients with minor acute ischemic stroke: an analysis of the ORIGINAL clinical trial

Xu, S.; Dai, H.; Lu, G.; Wang, W.; Che, F.; Geng, Y.; Bao, X.; Yan, S.; Li, S.; Wang, Y.

2026-03-20 neurology
10.64898/2026.03.17.26348663 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Stroke guidelines recommend intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) within 4.5 hours of symptom onset for patients with minor acute ischemic stroke (AIS) but disabling symptoms. However, such patients are often overlooked for treatment, increasing their risk of stroke-related disability. Tenecteplase is endorsed as an alternative to alteplase for IVT in patients with AIS. More evidence is required regarding its efficacy and safety in the minor stroke population. Methods: This post hoc analysis of the ORIGINAL randomized clinical trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tenecteplase versus alteplase in the patient subgroup with minor (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] 5) disabling stroke. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0 or 1 at Day 90. Results: Data were analyzed for 299 patients treated with tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg and 297 patients treated with alteplase 0.9 mg/kg. At Day 90, 86.3% of tenecteplase recipients and 82.8% of alteplase recipients achieved a mRS score of 0 or 1 (risk ratio=1.04 [95% confidence interval 0.971?1.114]; non-significant). No heterogeneity of treatment effect was observed across predefined subgroups according to baseline NIHSS score, time to drug administration, sex, age, presence (yes/no) of atrial fibrillation and diabetes and thrombectomy performed. No statistically significant differences were observed between tenecteplase and alteplase across secondary efficacy and safety outcomes. Conclusions: The comparable efficacy and safety of tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg and alteplase 0.9 mg/kg in the minor stroke population of the ORIGINAL randomized clinical trial suggests that tenecteplase is a suitable alternative to alteplase in this setting. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04915729 (ORIGINAL randomized clinical trial; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04915729). Submitted 4 June 2021. Key words: acute ischemic stroke, alteplase, intravenous thrombolysis, minor stroke, tenecteplase

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.9%
2
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
19.0%
3
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
7.3%
5
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
Neurocritical Care
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
7
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.9%
8
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
9
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
12
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
14
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
15
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
16
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
17
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
18
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
19
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
20
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
23
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.5%