Tenecteplase versus alteplase for patients with minor acute ischemic stroke: an analysis of the ORIGINAL clinical trial
Xu, S.; Dai, H.; Lu, G.; Wang, W.; Che, F.; Geng, Y.; Bao, X.; Yan, S.; Li, S.; Wang, Y.
Show abstract
Background: Stroke guidelines recommend intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) within 4.5 hours of symptom onset for patients with minor acute ischemic stroke (AIS) but disabling symptoms. However, such patients are often overlooked for treatment, increasing their risk of stroke-related disability. Tenecteplase is endorsed as an alternative to alteplase for IVT in patients with AIS. More evidence is required regarding its efficacy and safety in the minor stroke population. Methods: This post hoc analysis of the ORIGINAL randomized clinical trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tenecteplase versus alteplase in the patient subgroup with minor (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] 5) disabling stroke. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0 or 1 at Day 90. Results: Data were analyzed for 299 patients treated with tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg and 297 patients treated with alteplase 0.9 mg/kg. At Day 90, 86.3% of tenecteplase recipients and 82.8% of alteplase recipients achieved a mRS score of 0 or 1 (risk ratio=1.04 [95% confidence interval 0.971?1.114]; non-significant). No heterogeneity of treatment effect was observed across predefined subgroups according to baseline NIHSS score, time to drug administration, sex, age, presence (yes/no) of atrial fibrillation and diabetes and thrombectomy performed. No statistically significant differences were observed between tenecteplase and alteplase across secondary efficacy and safety outcomes. Conclusions: The comparable efficacy and safety of tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg and alteplase 0.9 mg/kg in the minor stroke population of the ORIGINAL randomized clinical trial suggests that tenecteplase is a suitable alternative to alteplase in this setting. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04915729 (ORIGINAL randomized clinical trial; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04915729). Submitted 4 June 2021. Key words: acute ischemic stroke, alteplase, intravenous thrombolysis, minor stroke, tenecteplase
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of Time to Thrombolysis on Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Treated with Tenecteplase Compared to Alteplase: Analysis from the AcT Randomized Controlled Trial 99%
- Prospective Observational Cohort Study Of Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase In Routine Clinical Practice 98%
- Safety Outcomes of Mechanical Thrombectomy Versus Combined Thrombectomy and Intravenous Thrombolysis in Tandem Lesions 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Endovascular thrombectomy: an effective and safe therapy for perioperative ischemic stroke 95%
- Workflow Intervals andOutcomesof Endovascular Treatment for Acute Large-Vessel Occlusion During On- Versus Off-Hours in China The ANGEL-ACT Registry 95%
- Short-term Functional Outcomes of Patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage in the Native and Expatriate Population 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modified Rankin Scale Disability Status at Day 4 Poststroke is an Informative Predictor of Long-Term Day 90 Outcome 96%
- White matter lesions as a prognostic marker of recurrence in cryptogenic stroke with high-risk patent foramen ovale 96%
- Impact of Fludrocortisone on the Outcomes of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients: A Retrospective Analysis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Adjunctive Intra-arterial Urokinase after Successful Endovascular Thrombectomy in Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke (POST-UK): Study protocol of a multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint trial 97%
- Prehospital triage of intracranial hemorrhage and anterior large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke: the value of the rapid arterial occlusion evalution 96%
- Large Core Thrombectomy: Feasibility Of Simplified Protocol In Resource-Limited Settings 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.