Back

Pregnancy Desire and Pregnancy Attempt: Why Words Matter in Reproductive Research -- A Nationwide cross-sectional Cohort Study

KABIRIAN, R.; Bas, R.; Chabassier, A.; Sebbag, C.; Rousset-Jablonski, C.; Bobrie, A.; Coussy, F.; Preau, M.; Espie, M.; Dumas, E.; Reyal, F.; Jacob, G.; Jochum, F.; Hamy Petit, A.-S.

2026-03-19 oncology
10.64898/2026.03.17.26348589 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo quantify the gap between pregnancy desire and pregnancy attempts among young women with and without a history of breast cancer (BC), and to identify factors associated with this gap. DesignCross-sectional cohort study. SettingThe FEERIC study, conducted in France. PopulationWomen aged 18-43 years without or with prior BC filling inclusion forms of a collaborative study. MethodsPregnancy desire was assessed by self-report ("Do you currently desire a pregnancy?"). Attempt was defined as engaging in unprotected intercourse with the intention to conceive. The pregnancy desire-attempt gap was defined as expressing a desire for pregnancy without actively trying to conceive. Logistic regression was used to evaluate associated demographic, clinical, and treatment-related factors. Main outcome measuresPrevalence of the pregnancy desire-attempt gap and predictors of this gap among BC survivors. ResultsOf 4,351 participants (517 with BC and 3,834 controls), 735 (16.9%) reported a pregnancy desire with 54% attempting conception and 46% who did not. The desire-attempt gap was significantly more frequent in women with a history of BC (OR=1.62, 95%CI[1.15-2.30]). Among BC survivors, younger age (<30years), nulliparity, being single, and ongoing endocrine therapy were independently associated with the gap, whereas prior chemotherapy or trastuzumab were not. ConclusionsNearly half of women declaring desiring pregnancy do not initiate pregnancy attempts, with a larger gap among BC survivors. These findings highlight the need to explore both medical barriers and psychosocial determinants underlying this gap and underscore the importance of refining the language used in reproductive research. FundingThis study was supported by "SHS INCa" grant no.2016-124 and is part of a research project on young women funded by Monoprix*.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
2
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.3%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 1%
12.2%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.0%
5
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
6
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
8
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
9
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
10
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
11
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
12
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.9%
14
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
15
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
16
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
17
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
18
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
19
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
20
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
21
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
23
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
24
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
25
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
26
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
28
BMC Research Notes
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
29
JCO Precision Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%