Back

Effects of Genetically-Proxied Antihypertensive Drug Targets on Preeclampsia and Birth Weight

Ardissino, M.; Morley, A. P.; Richards, E. M. F.; Zollner, J.; Truong, B.; Williamson, C.; Honigberg, M. C.; Ware, J.; Nicolaides, K. H.; de Marvao, A.

2026-03-23 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.03.17.26346752 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPreeclampsia is a leading cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality, and a major contributor to low birth weight. Beta blockers (BB) and calcium channel blockers (CCB) are the most commonly recommended agents to treat hypertension in pregnancy. Yet it remains unknown whether these agents alter the risk of preeclampsia (PE), and if so, whether effects arise through maternal physiology or through direct fetal mechanisms. ObjectivesTo use drug-target Mendelian randomization (MR) to estimate the effects of genetically-proxied inhibition of beta-adrenergic and L-type calcium-channel targets on PE risk, birth weight, partitioned into maternal and fetal genetic components, and gestational age (GA). MethodsWe constructed instruments from genome-wide significant, LD-independent variants within prespecified windows around systolic blood pressure (SBP) modulating drug targets in addition to a genome-wide SBP instrument (European ancestry). Outcomes comprised of PE (16,349 cases / 595,135 controls), maternal and fetal genetic effects on birth weight (n{approx}210,267 and n{approx}298,142), and GA (n{approx}151,987). Two-sample MR estimated effects per 5mmHg decrease in SBP. Bayesian colocalization assessed shared causal variants. Multiple testing was controlled with Benjamini-Hochberg correction. ResultsGenetically lower SBP was associated with reduced PE risk and modest increases in birth weight and GA. BB (ADRB1) target inhibition showed no convincing reduction in PE risk but was associated with lower birth weight, with associations predominantly through direct fetal genetic effects and strong colocalization at ADRB1 with fetal birth-weight signals. In contrast, CCB targets collectively associated with lower PE risk without consistent evidence of fetal growth impairment; colocalization support for individual CCB loci was limited. Sensitivity analyses (heterogeneity, pleiotropy) did not materially alter these patterns where instrument counts permitted. ConclusionsDrug-target MR suggests that BB pathways are unlikely to meaningfully reduce PE and are linked to reduced fetal growth - chiefly via direct fetal mechanisms. In contrast, CCB pathways are associated with lower PE risk and largely neutral fetal growth effects. These findings support prioritizing CCBs for evaluation in comparative trials of PE prevention.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
39.3%
2
Hypertension
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
50% of probability mass above
3
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
4
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
5
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.3%
6
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
7
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
8
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.6%
9
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
10
European Heart Journal
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.5%
12
Diabetologia
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
13
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
14
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.2%
16
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
17
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Kidney360
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
20
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.7%
21
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
22
International Journal of Obesity
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
23
Epidemiology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
24
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%