Back

Computational Fluid Particle Dynamics-Informed Machine Learning Prototype for a User-Centered Smart Inhaler Enabling Uniform Drug Delivery to Small Airways

Zhang, Z.; Yi, H.; Kolanjiyil, A. V.; Liu, C.; Feng, Y.

2026-03-19 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.03.16.712264 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Small airways are the primary sites of airflow obstruction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Effective delivery of aerosolized drug particles to these regions is crucial to maximize treatment efficacy while minimizing side effects. However, conventional inhalation therapy approaches (i.e., full-mouth particle release and inhalation (FMD)) typically result in insufficient drug deposition in the small airways and an uneven distribution across the five lung lobes. To address such deficiencies, the goals of this study are triple folds: (1) to develop a fast and accurate framework to secure target drug delivery (TDD) nozzle diameter and location based on the conventional computational fluid particle dynamics (CFPD)-FMD simulations, (2) to develop a CFPD-informed machine learning (ML) inverse-design framework that predicts optimal inhaler nozzle parameters based on patient-specific breathing patterns and drug properties, and (3) to demonstrate the feasibility of embedding this framework into a user-centered smart inhaler prototype to improve uniform TTD to the small airways across all five lung lobes. Specifically, a subject-specific mouth-to-generation-10 human respiratory system was employed, and 108 high-fidelity CFPD-FMD simulations were performed under varied physiological and design parameters, including tidal volume, particle diameter, release location, and release timing. Particle release maps generated from those CFPD-FMD simulations via backtracking identified optimal nozzle diameters and locations that promote uniform multi-lobe drug delivery while limiting off-target deposition. Accordingly, a dataset was compiled with inputs (i.e., flow rate, particle size, release z-coordinate, release time) and targets (i.e., nozzle center x- and y-coordinates, nozzle diameter). These inputs and targets form the CFPD-TDD dataset, on which 16 ML models were trained to learn inverse mapping from patient- and drug-specific inputs to optimal nozzle design parameters. Performance was evaluated using mean squared error (MSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) overall and per target feature. Parametric analysis using CFPD-FMD simulations was conducted to determine how patient-specific and drug-specific factors affect pulmonary air-particle transport dynamics and to explain why achieving CFPD-TDD in small airways with CFPD-FMD strategies remains challenging. Furthermore, the ML evaluation in this feasibility study demonstrated robust learning of the inverse mapping from patient-specific inputs to optimal nozzle parameters. Four top-performing models showed consistently low MSE/MAE across cases, and an ensemble (i.e., mixed model (MixModel)) combining their strengths was formulated. Independent CFPD-TDD simulations beyond the training and testing datasets were used as the ground truth to validate ML-predicted nozzle configurations. Compared with conventional CFPD-FMD strategies, ML-guided nozzle designs significantly improved inter-lobar deposition uniformity and reduced off-target deposition in the upper airways, demonstrating the feasibility of ML-enabled TDD to the small airways. Overall, this study establishes a CFPD-informed ML inverse-design framework as a viable algorithmic foundation for user-centered smart inhalers, enabling adaptive, patient-specific TDD to the small airways with improved deposition uniformity across all five lung lobes. By integrating first-principle-based CFPD with ML, this work provides a methodological pathway toward next-generation smart inhalers for more effective treatment of small airway diseases.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.9%
2
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.3%
3
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.9%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 17%
6.4%
5
Journal of Controlled Release
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
6
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
8
Physics of Fluids
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
10
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
11
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.9%
12
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
13
APL Bioengineering
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
Indoor Air
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
16
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
17
Journal of Biomedical Optics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.2%
19
Molecular Pharmaceutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
20
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
21
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.9%
23
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 55%
0.8%
25
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
26
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.7%
27
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.7%
28
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
29
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
30
Nature Machine Intelligence
61 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%