Back

Dispersal rate limits range expansion rate only when it is slower than climate velocity

Moore, N. A.; Lenoir, J. A.; Comte, L.; Lawlor, J. A.; Sunday, J. M.

2026-03-18 ecology
10.64898/2026.03.16.712231 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Low dispersal ability might limit a species capacity to track its climate preferences across the landscape, yet evidence that low dispersal slows species range shifts under contemporary climate change remains contentious. Here we develop a new hypothesis under which we expect variation in dispersal ability to affect range expansion rates only when climate velocity exceeds dispersal rates, which is logical yet rarely applied because it requires a common yardstick to compare rates. We test this hypothesis using empirical relationships between dispersal ability, local range expansion rate, and the velocity of isotherm shifts in terrestrial plants and birds, all estimated in km/yr. In 370 range shifts, we found that range expansion rates were best explained by the slower of either a species dispersal rate or the velocity of isotherm shifts, as predicted under our hypothesis. Furthermore, when species dispersal rates were slower than the velocity of isotherm shifts, we found that dispersal ability positively affects range shift rates. Substantial variation in range expansion rates remained unexplained, indicating that additional factors influence range shift dynamics. Our results provide new clarity when understanding the role of dispersal ability on variation in range shift rates and emphasize the importance of evaluating dispersal capacity relative to climatic change exposure when testing hypotheses about species responses to ongoing environmental change. Significance StatementSpecies dispersal ability is widely thought to limit biodiversity redistribution in response to climate change, but we still lack a clear understanding of when or for which species dispersal limitations matter. Using hundreds of range expansion rates documented over the 10 last decades for terrestrial birds and plants together with their dispersal rates, in common units of km/yr, we show that dispersal ability slows climate-mediated range expansion, but that dispersal limitations occur only when the rates of climate change are faster than the ability of species to redistribute. So far, many species display dispersal rates higher than the velocity of climate change but dispersal limitations may become more pronounced in the future.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 4%
13.7%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 3%
13.7%
3
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.6%
4
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.0%
5
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.6%
7
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.6%
8
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.6%
9
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
10
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.8%
11
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
12
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.4%
13
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.6%
14
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.6%
15
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 14%
2.0%
16
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
17
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
19
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
20
Ecological Monographs
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
21
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
23
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
24
Systematic Biology
121 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%