Back

Visual crowding in albinism: Evidence for a cortical sensory deficit with oculomotor influences

Tailor-Hamblin, V. K.; Theodorou, M.; Dahlmann-Noor, A.; Dekker, T. M.; Greenwood, J. A.

2026-03-18 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.03.16.712204 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeFoveal vision in individuals with albinism is impaired not only by reduced visual acuity but also by elevated crowding - the disruption of object recognition in clutter. Because albinism is characterised by both retinal underdevelopment and nystagmus (uncontrolled eye movements), it is unclear whether crowding is elevated primarily from image motion due to eye movements or an additional sensory deficit. To disentangle these factors, we examined the spatial and featural selectivity of foveal crowding in albinism, comparing performance with controls and prior data from individuals with idiopathic infantile nystagmus syndrome (IINS), where nystagmus occurs without retinal underdevelopment. MethodsAdults with albinism (n=8) and age-matched controls (n=8; 19-49 years) identified the orientation of foveal Landolt-C targets. In Experiment 1, targets were presented alone or flanked horizontally or vertically to assess spatial selectivity. In Experiment 2, flankers were of the same or opposite contrast polarity to assess featural selectivity. Stimulus size was adaptively scaled using QUEST to estimate gap-size thresholds. ResultsCrowding was substantially elevated in albinism, relative to both controls and IINS. Experiment 1 revealed stronger crowding for horizontally than vertically positioned flankers in albinism, mirroring the predominant direction of nystagmic eye movements. In Experiment 2, opposite-polarity flankers did not reduce crowding, indicating an absence of selectivity for target-flanker similarity. ConclusionsFoveal crowding in albinism is markedly elevated, with a nystagmus-related spatial anisotropy and a lack of featural selectivity. These characteristics suggest that these elevations reflect both retinal image motion and a substantial sensory deficit arising from abnormal visual development.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
22.7%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.6%
3
Journal of Vision
92 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
4
Developmental Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.4%
6
Translational Vision Science & Technology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
7
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
8
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
9
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.7%
11
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
Vision Research
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
14
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
15
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
16
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
17
The Cerebellum
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
18
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
20
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
22
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
25
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.6%
26
Journal of Medical Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
27
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.6%
28
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
29
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
30
Behavior Research Methods
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%