Back

Emerging invasion risks of non-native urban trees in continental Europe under a changing climate

Britvec, M.; Piria, M.; Vitasovic Kosic, I.; Flory, S. L.; Mitic, B.; Essert, S.; Hrusevar, D.; Kim, S.; Ljubicic, I.; Vilizzi, L.

2026-03-18 ecology
10.64898/2026.03.16.712173 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Urban green areas often harbour numerous non-native urban trees, many of which have characteristics that predispose them to escape from cultivation and become potentially invasive. Climate change is expected to exacerbate this risk by creating favourable conditions for species that are currently climatically restricted. The potential risks for invasiveness of urban tree species in continental Europe are not yet known. Here, we provide a comprehensive risk screening of 34 non-native urban tree species in continental Europe, for both current and projected future climate scenarios. Using the Terrestrial Plant Species Invasiveness Screening Kit (TPS-ISK v2.4), we assessed invasion risk based on biogeography, ecology, and projected responses to climate change. Results showed that under current conditions, 10 species (29.4%) were categorised as high risk, 23 (67.6%) as medium risk and one (2.9%) as low risk. The inclusion of climate change projections increased the number of high risk species to 11, with seven species categorised as very high risk. These taxa exhibit strong ecological plasticity, high reproductive performance and broad environmental tolerance, which together with projected warming, emphasises their significant potential for further spread. Our results emphasise the urgent need for early detection, continuous monitoring and proactive management of non-native urban trees in Europe, especially those that are widely used in horticulture and forestry. By integrating invasion biology with climate change risk screening, this study provides an important basis for evidence-based policy and management strategies to mitigate future ecological and economic impacts of invasions by urban trees.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 10%
18.5%
2
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
3
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.8%
5
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.8%
7
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.8%
8
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
9
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
10
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
11
Biotropica
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
12
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
14
Plant Pathology
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
15
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
16
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
17
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
18
Plant Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
19
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
21
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.9%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.7%
23
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
24
Pest Management Science
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
26
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%