Back

Estimating the evolutionary fitness of specific synonymous codon changes

Pavinato, V. A. C.; Hey, J.

2026-03-17 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.03.16.712166 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Synonymous mutations do not alter proteins but undergo natural selection in many species. For Drosophila melanogaster, reports on selection strength vary from undetectable to surprisingly strong. Here we apply a new method to estimate the population selection coefficient (2 Ns) for all 134 ordered pairs of synonymous codon changes. The method uses ratios of site frequency spectra (SFS) for codon changes to neutral changes, and does not depend on divergence data, or codon frequencies, and is relatively insensitive to demographic history. Results indicate that natural selection on synonymous codons is weak, with |2 Ns|<2.07 for all pairs of codons and |2 Ns|<1 for 64% of codon changes. Despite being derived solely from polymorphism data, codon fitness estimates are strongly correlated with observed codon frequencies. A selection-mutation-drift model based on our 2 Ns estimates accurately predicts codon usage, while a model based on mutation alone fails. Codon fitnesses correlate strongly with a measure of codon frequency covariation among genes, and codons with large frequency differences between high- and low-expression genes have high fitness values. Finally, we detect clear signs that selection favors codon changes that stabilize mRNA secondary structure. By avoiding divergence data, which have multiple sources of additional variance, and focusing solely on allele frequencies, a clear picture emerges of selection on codon usage. The convergence of multiple independent lines of evidence (codon frequencies, expression-dependent usage, covariation patterns, and mRNA structure) validates this polymorphism-based approach and provides a coherent framework for understanding selection on synonymous site evolution. Significance statementSynonymous mutations do not change proteins yet affect gene expression in multiple ways. Here we provide the first fitness estimates for each type of synonymous codon change. Using only allele frequencies--without divergence data, codon counts, or assumptions about preferred codons--we estimate the fitness of all 134 single-step synonymous codon changes in Drosophila melanogaster. Results reveal weak but non-negligible selection, with codon fitness values accurately predicting codon usage patterns, including expression-dependent biases, codon covariation across genes, and mRNA secondary structure effects. This work offers the first comprehensive fitness estimates for individual synonymous mutations, providing a direct population-level view of how subtle genetic changes shape molecular evolution and establishing a general strategy for quantifying weak selection using polymorphism data alone.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
14.8%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 3%
11.7%
3
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
11.7%
4
BMC Evolutionary Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.6%
5
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 1%
8.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.8%
7
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.8%
8
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.4%
10
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.7%
11
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
12
Evolution Letters
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
13
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.3%
14
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 67%
1.1%
15
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
16
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
17
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
110 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
20
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.0%
21
Journal of Molecular Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
22
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
23
Nature Ecology & Evolution
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
24
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
25
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%