Back

Neighborhood-Level Disadvantage Impacts Multiple Measures of Brain Health: An Imaging Epidemiology Study

Willbrand, E. H.; Stoeckl, E. M.; Belden, D.; Chu, S. Y.; Melcher, E. M.; Zhitnitskii, D.; Bonke, E.; Mattila, J.; Iftikhar, U.; Koikkalainen, J.; Tolonen, A.; Lotjonen, J.; Bruce, R.; Yu, J.-P. J.

2026-03-18 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.03.16.712147 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe relationship between neighborhood-level socioeconomic disadvantage and brain health is an emerging area of research with critical implications for public health and clinical practice, yet its influence on brain structure remains unclear. PurposeTo investigate the epidemiological association between neighborhood-level socioeconomic disadvantage [Area Deprivation Index (ADI)] and morphometric neuroimaging variables in a consecutive, non-disease enriched patient population. Materials and MethodsThis study, conducted at an academic medical center and associated community partners, used consecutive cross-sectional MRI neuroimaging data from 2,826 inpatient and outpatient individuals without radiological evidence of disease from January 2024 to June 2024. ADI, a geospatially determined index of neighborhood-level disadvantage, was calculated for each individual. Linear regressions tested the relationship between ADI and multiple morphometric variables: brain age gap (BAG; estimated - chronological BA), total brain tissue volume (TBV; total gray + white matter), five subcortical region volumes (hippocampus, thalamus, caudate, putamen, and nucleus accumbens) and four cortical region volumes [anterior cingulate cortex, posterior cingulate cortex, medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC), lateral PFC (LPFC)]. Volumetric measures were normalized to intracranial volume. Models controlled for age, sex, and total white matter hyperintensity volume (WMHV). Results2,826 individuals (mean age, 52.7 {+/-} 18.8 [standard deviation]; 1732 women) were evaluated. Residence in the 20% most disadvantaged neighborhoods was associated with a higher BAG ({beta}s > 2.12, Ps < .01) and decreased TBV ({beta}s < -5.12, Ps < .05). Additionally, increased WMHV was higher among those in the most disadvantaged neighborhoods (ts < - 2.50, Ps < .05) and associated with lower volume in most regions. Interaction models showed increased negative associations between WMHV and volumes of the caudate, nucleus accumbens, and lateral prefrontal cortex among those in the most disadvantaged neighborhoods. ConclusionsNeighborhood disadvantage is associated with adverse brain morphometry, including higher BAG, lower TBV, and amplified vascular-related regional volume loss. Key ResultsO_LIIn 2,826 adults (mean age, 53 years {+/-} 19; 1,732 women), residence in the most disadvantaged neighborhoods (national: 116/2,826, 4%; state: 129/2826, 5%) was associated with higher brain age gap at the national ({beta} = 2.12, 95% CI = 0.81 to 3.43, P = .001) and state levels ({beta} = 2.36; 95% CI = 1.10 to 3.61, P < .001). C_LIO_LITotal brain tissue volume was lower at the national ({beta} = -5.12, 95% CI = -10.13 to -0.11, P = .045) and state levels ({beta} = -6.13, 95% CI = -10.90 to -1.37, P = .011). C_LIO_LIWhite matter hyperintensity volume was higher in the most disadvantaged group (national: P = .013; state: P = .003) and demonstrated amplified associations with caudate, nucleus accumbens, and lateral prefrontal cortex volumes in the most disadvantaged group at the national and/or state levels (Ps < .05). C_LI

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.6%
2
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
7.4%
3
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.0%
4
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.0%
5
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
5.0%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.0%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.7%
8
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
9
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
10
Brain, Behavior, & Immunity - Health
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
11
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
12
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
13
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
14
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
16
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
17
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
18
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
19
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
20
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 36%
1.4%
21
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
22
Brain Imaging and Behavior
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
23
Brain Structure and Function
83 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
24
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
25
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
81 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
26
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
27
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
28
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
29
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
Aperture Neuro
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%