Back

Molecular Determinants of Allosteric Inhibitor Affinity and Selectivity in PDE5

Verma, J.; Vashisth, H.

2026-03-18 biophysics
10.64898/2026.03.16.712116 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Allosteric inhibitors targeting unique regulatory pockets provide an opportunity for selective modulation of proteins within the phosphodiesterase (PDE) family. In this work, we investigate the molecular determinants for binding of an evodiamine derivative (EVO) to PDE5 and the structural basis for differential recognition of this inhibitor in PDE6 isoforms. We integrated structural modeling, all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, and extensive alchemical free-energy calculations to quantify residue-level contributions to inhibitor binding in PDE5 through systematic alanine scanning and PDE6-derived mutations. Thermodynamic analysis based on free energy identified key residues that govern EVO binding through a network of hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic contacts. Specifically, we examined structural changes associated with allosteric pocket variations in PDE5, identified key structural elements, and evaluated the role of chemical substituents of EVO in allosteric inhibition. Moreover, PDE6-derived substitutions revealed isoform specific effects, with PDE6-rod substitutions resulting in stronger destabilization than PDE6-cone substitutions. Together, these results define the energetic and structural basis for allosteric inhibition of PDE5 and provide mechanistic insights for the rational design of selective PDE inhibitors. TOC Graphic O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=111 SRC="FIGDIR/small/712116v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (14K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@124e1a9org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@5b3ea2org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@6d050borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@166197f_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.