Evidence for timing in the midsession reversal task with rats in operant conditioning boxes

The midsession reversal (MSR) task is frequently used to study behavioral flexibility and decision strategies in animals. In a typical version of the task, subjects complete 80 trials in which they choose between two simultaneously presented stimuli, S1 and S2. During the first 40 trials, responses to S1 are reinforced, whereas responses to S2 are not. The contingencies then reverse without warning: From trial 41 to 80, only responses to S2 are reinforced. In birds, performance in this task is often characterized by anticipatory and perseverative errors around the reversal point, suggesting a reliance on elapsed time since the session began. In contrast, rats tested in operant conditioning chambers typically show near-optimal performance with few errors, a pattern often interpreted as evidence that rats rely primarily on local reinforcement cues rather than temporal information. The present study investigated whether rats exclusively rely on local cues in the MSR task or whether temporal information also contributes to the decision process. Two groups of rats were trained with different intertrial intervals (ITIs; 5 s or 10 s) while the reversal point remained fixed at Trial 41. During acquisition, both groups diplayed similar learning rates and near-optimal steady-state performance with minimal anticipatory or perseverative errors. However, when the ITI was manipulated in probe sessions, systematic shifts in switching behavior emerged. Rats adjusted their choices according to the temporal midpoint experienced during training rather than the nominal trial number of the reversal. These results suggest that rats rely on a mixed strategy that integrates local reinforcement cues with global timing information. Temporal control may therefore be present even when it is not expressed during standard training conditions.