scTimeBench: A streamlined benchmarking platform for single-cell time-series analysis
Osakwe, A.; Huang, E. H.; Li, Y.
Show abstract
Temporal modelling of single-cell gene expression is essential for capturing dynamic cellular processes, yet a systematic framework for evaluating time-aware trajectory inference methods has not yet been established. Here, we present a modular and scalable benchmark designed to assess methods across three critical tasks: forecast accuracy (temporal cell alignment) for projecting cells to unseen time points, embedding coherence between original and projected data, and cell-type lineage fidelity. We evaluated nine state-of-the-art methods, which are broadly categorized into 7 forecasting-based and 2 optimal transport (OT)-based methods across eight diverse datasets spanning four species. Our results show that while several methods achieve high forecast accuracy, they often fail to preserve biological signals, both in their latent spaces and in cell lineage reconstruction. Notably, most methods confer low lineage fidelity and often underperform compared to a correlation baseline. We further demonstrate that integrating pseudotime can effectively denoise trajectories by aligning the data snapshots with the intrinsic biological clock in each cell. Finally, to streamline benchmarking for temporal single-cell analysis, we built one of the first self-contained Python packages for the research community: https://github.com/li-lab-mcgill/scTimeBench.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Data-driven selection of analysis decisions in single-cell RNA-seq trajectory inference 96%
- Sincast: a computational framework to predict cell identities in single cell transcriptomes using bulk atlases as references 95%
- scValue: value-based subsampling of large-scale single-cell transcriptomic data for machine and deep learning tasks 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.