Back

Freshwater biodiversity is not adequately addressed by the current protected areas of the Caribbean biodiversity hotspot

Torres-Cambas, Y.; Diez, Y. L.; Megna, Y. S.; Salazar-Salina, J. C.; Domisch, S.

2026-03-18 ecology
10.64898/2026.03.16.712036 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AimFreshwater species face significant challenges from direct and indirect anthropogenic impacts, leading to a global decline in freshwater biodiversity. Protected areas are a key tool for conservation, but their effectiveness in covering freshwater biodiversity remains uncertain. This study assesses the protection coverage of freshwater macroinvertebrates, vertebrates, and macrophytes in Cuba against the 17% and 30% conservation targets set by the Convention on Biological Diversity. LocationCaribbean biodiversity hotspot, including freshwater ecosystems across the Cuban archipelago. MethodsWe analyzed the distribution of 182 freshwater macroinvertebrates, 26 vertebrates, and 19 macrophyte species using an ensemble of four species distribution modeling techniques: Maxent, Boosted Regression Trees (BRT), Random Forest (RF), and Spatial Stream Network (SSN). We evaluated species overlap with Cubas current protected areas and conducted spatial conservation prioritization exercises that (i) included (lock-in) and (ii) excluded (free-choice) existing protected areas. ResultsOur analysis revealed that 41% (90 species) and 71% (161 species) failed to meet the 17% and 30% conservation targets, respectively. Many of the insufficiently protected species are globally threatened or endemic to the Cuban archipelago, heightening their extinction risk. Conservation planning that includes current protected areas requires significantly larger areas to meet the 30% representation target due to redundancy in existing protections. Conversely, excluding current protected areas achieves conservation goals more efficiently with fewer resources. Both approaches highlight the need to improve connectivity, particularly in upstream regions that are often neglected under the current protected area configuration. Main conclusionsFreshwater biodiversity in Cuba is poorly represented within existing protected areas. Meeting the 30% conservation target would require protecting an additional 30-70% of area, with a focus on headwaters and underrepresented taxa. Expanding Cubas National System of Protected Areas (SNAP) to prioritize fresh-water species, particularly endemics, is essential. A spatial conservation planning approach that integrates both lock-in and free-choice strategies can optimize resource use while enhancing connectivity across key rivers and tributaries.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 10%
18.1%
2
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.1%
3
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
4
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.9%
5
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.7%
7
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
8
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.5%
10
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
11
Biodiversity and Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
12
Conservation Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
13
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
14
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
15
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
16
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
17
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
18
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
21
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
22
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
23
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%