Back

Integrated in vivo and transcriptomic analyses of lethal Oropouche virus infection reveal suppression of pathogenic host responses by antiviral therapy

Sousa Moraes, C.; Gonzalez, G.; Sato, A.; Miki, S.; Inoue, A.; Tabata, K.; Kranrod, J. W.; Kabamba, C. F.; Ohnuma, A.; Matsuno, K.; Harada, R.; Saito, S.; Sasaki, M.; Orba, Y.; Hall, W. W.; Sawa, H.; Itakura, Y.

2026-03-16 microbiology
10.64898/2026.03.16.712021 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Oropouche virus (OROV) is an emerging arbovirus responsible for large outbreaks of febrile illness in Central and South America, with increasing reports of severe neurological disease and fatal outcomes. Despite its growing public health impact, no approved antiviral therapies or vaccines are currently available. Here, we show that favipiravir, a broad-spectrum nucleoside analogue, robustly suppresses OROV replication and disease in vivo. In a lethal Syrian hamster model, favipiravir treatment provided complete protection against OROV infection, preventing viral dissemination to peripheral organs and the central nervous system, and remained highly effective when administration was initiated after infection. In contrast, insufficient antiviral control resulted in viral neuroinvasion and fatality. To define host responses associated with OROV pathogenesis and their modulation by antiviral therapy, we performed transcriptomic profiling of liver and brain tissues. OROV infection induced interferon-driven inflammatory programs accompanied by marked disruption of metabolic and tissue homeostatic pathways, whereas these transcriptional signatures were largely abrogated by favipiravir treatment. Together, our findings identify favipiravir as a potent antiviral candidate against OROV and provide the first in vivo, tissue-resolved transcriptomic framework of OROV infection, linking effective viral suppression with the prevention of neuroinvasion and pathogenic host responses. These results highlight antiviral intervention as a viable strategy to mitigate OROV-associated disease and mortality.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 7%
17.8%
2
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
16.7%
3
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.5%
4
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.0%
5
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Cell Host & Microbe
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.8%
7
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.4%
8
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.4%
9
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 16%
3.4%
10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 22%
3.4%
11
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.8%
12
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
13
Immunity
58 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
14
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
15
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.6%
16
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
17
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.6%
18
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.2%
20
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
21
Emerging Microbes & Infections
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.8%
23
Cell Discovery
54 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
25
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
Journal of Experimental Medicine
106 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
28
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.7%
29
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
30
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.6%