Back

Canonical Analysis of Fluorescent Timer-Anchored Transcriptomes Resolves Joint Temporal and Developmental Progression

Irie, N.; Reda, O.; Satou, Y.; Ono, M.

2026-03-18 systems biology
10.64898/2026.03.16.711988 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cell-state transitions during development are shaped by multiple concurrent processes, yet single-cell transcriptomic analyses often rely on static molecular profiles or infer time without an experimental anchor. We developed mCanonicalTockySeq, a systems-level framework that reconstructs temporally resolved developmental state spaces by combining signalling history with single-cell RNA sequencing. Using the Nr4a3-Tocky Fluorescent Timer system in developing thymic T cells, we combined scRNA-seq with a molecular clock of strong T-cell receptor signalling to establish an experimentally anchored temporal reference. Using Timer-defined landmark populations, mCanonicalTockySeq constructs a shared state space in which temporal progression and developmental maturation are jointly represented, identifying a Tocky-defined temporal manifold while resolving progression toward CD4 and CD8 single-positive states. This framework recovered biologically coherent dynamics of immediate TCR-response genes, lineage-associated regulators, and agonist-selection-associated programmes. We then extended the framework across species by translating human thymic single-cell transcriptomes into one-to-one mouse ortholog space and projecting them into the mouse Nr4a3-Tocky reference. The projected human cells occupied an interpretable temporal-developmental geometry, and the inferred Tocky-equivalent temporal coordinate showed a significant donor-level association with chronological age. Together, these results establish mCanonicalTockySeq as a general framework for modelling how signalling history and developmental progression are jointly organised in single-cell state space, and illustrate how experimentally anchored reference systems can support comparative analyses across species.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.