Back

De Novo Regeneration of Rete Ridges during Cetacean skin wound healing

Liu, T.-Y.; Wang, H.-V.; Yang, W.-C.; Yang, C.-C.; Su, C.-Y.; Chiou, Y.-T.; Chiou, T.-H.; Shieh, S.-J.; Tang, M.-J.; Chuong, C. M.; Hughes, M. W.

2026-03-19 pathology
10.64898/2026.03.16.711258 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Humans are tight-skinned mammals who typically fail to regenerate large full-thickness skin wounds, instead healing with substantial scarring and concomitant loss of function. Mechanical context is a major determinant of this outcome: elevated tissue tension or stiffness promotes fibrotic repair associated with hypertrophic or keloid scarring. Accordingly, regenerative medicine research has relied on diverse animal models to understand scar development and skin regeneration. Loose-skinned mammals exhibit greater regeneration ability. Furthermore, spiny mouse skin is significantly less stiff and associated with enhanced regenerative ability. Interestingly, this skin wound stiffness can be modulated to shift healing toward more regenerative or more fibrotic trajectories. Despite of this progress, the restoration of normal skin architecture after large-full thickness injury has not been elucidated in tight-skinned mammals. Can large full-thickness wounds regenerate with minimal scarring in tight-skinned mammals? Here we show the tight-skinned mammal Frasers Dolphin regenerates de novo a complex rete ridge architecture with associated vasculature and minimal scar following large full-thickness wound healing. Counterintuitively, this skin regeneration occurs in an aqueous, high-shear stress and high-tension environment. Complete rete ridge regeneration in tight-skinned mammals has not been documented and not observed in humans except in utero. This unique ability to rebuild elaborate rete ridges under tension is an opportunity to uncover molecular, cellular, and tissue-level mechanisms that enable regenerative wound healing in a mechanical regime typically associated with fibrosis.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 3%
22.6%
2
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.1%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.1%
4
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.8%
5
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 17%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Cell Stem Cell
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
7
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.0%
8
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.9%
9
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.6%
10
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.1%
11
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.9%
12
Stem Cell Reports
118 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
13
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
14
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
16
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.5%
17
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.5%
18
Matrix Biology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
19
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
20
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
Journal of Investigative Dermatology
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
22
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
23
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.6%
24
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
26
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
27
Nature Cell Biology
99 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
28
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%