Back

Spectral Phenotyping Reveals Time-Specific QTLs in Field-Grown Lettuce

Mehrem, S. L.; Zijl, A.; de Haan, M.; Van den Ackerveken, G.; Snoek, B. L.

2026-03-18 plant biology
10.64898/2026.03.16.711173 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Lettuce (Lactuca sativa) is an important field crop, but our understanding of its phenotypic variation and underlying genetics under natural field conditions remains limited, posing challenges for identifying effective crop breeding targets. Longitudinal hyperspectral phenotyping allows for non-invasive monitoring of crop performance under diverse agricultural conditions. In this study, we used hyperspectral imaging to assess the phenotypic variation of almost 200 different field-grown lettuce varieties, following the same plants from just after seedling- to flowering-stage. With automated image processing, we extracted a wide range of spectral phenotypes related to metabolite content, growth efficiency, and environmental stress responses, creating a multi-dimensional time-resolved data set. Principal component analysis (PCA) revealed the major axes of spectral variation over time, and highlighted differences in spectral patterns among lettuce genotypes. Integrating on-site weather data, we modelled GxE interactions of reflectance, revealing regions of the lettuce vegetation spectrum that are primarily shaped by genotype and/or environment. We estimated phenotypic plasticity in response to time, temperature and rainfall using best linear unbiased predictions (BLUPs), capturing genotype-specific developmental trajectories and responses to the environment. We used genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to identify quantitative trait loci (QTLs) of PC-based, single and BLUP-based phenotypes, disentangling the genetic architecture of spectral lettuce phenotypes from major axes of variation down to single wavelength spectral plasticity. These findings provide new insights into the genome-wide genetic regulation and dynamics of spectral phenotypes in field grown lettuce.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
14.5%
2
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.9%
3
The Plant Phenome Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
4
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.0%
5
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
7.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Plant Phenomics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
7
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.2%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 27%
3.5%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 21%
3.5%
10
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
11
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.9%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.9%
14
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
15
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
16
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
17
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
18
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
19
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.9%
20
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
21
in silico Plants
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
Plant Methods
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
23
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.8%
24
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.8%
26
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
27
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
28
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
Quantitative Plant Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%