Role of Lifestyle and Risk Factor Modification Clinics in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

BackgroundIncidence and recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with several lifestyle risk factors. Lifestyle and risk factor modification (LRFM) clinics could have a role in comprehensively addressing AF from a holistic patient-centred approach to improve clinical outcomes. MethodsWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the role of LRFM clinics compared with usual care (UC) in patients with AF. The primary endpoint was atrial arrhythmia recurrence. Secondary endpoints were AF and heart failure (HF) related hospitalisation, cardiovascular death, stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA), and quality-of-life (QOL). ResultsA total of eleven RCTs with a total of 3364 patients were included (five RCTs performed in the context of AF ablation). Mean age was 58-73 years, 30% were female and 18% had persistent AF. Duration of follow-up ranged from 3-24 months. LRFM clinics significantly reduced the primary endpoint of arrhythmia recurrence compared with UC after catheter ablation (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.23-0.51, p<0.001, I2=0%). LRFM clinics also reduced AF-related hospitalisation (OR 0.70, 95%CI 0.51-0.98, p=0.04, I2=21%) and improved QOL (mean improvement on Short Form 36 Questionnaire 8.90, 95% CI 7.6.91-10.90, p<0.001). There was no difference between LRFM clinics and UC for HF-related hospitalisation (p=0.16), cardiovascular deaths (p=0.79) or stroke/TIA (p=0.83). ConclusionIn this meta-analysis of RCTs, LRFM clinics reduced AF recurrence after ablation, reduced AF-related hospitalisation and improved QOL. This study supports a comprehensive multidisciplinary lifestyle risk modification model of care to improve clinical outcomes in patients with AF.