Evolving Ocular Safety Signals of EGFR Inhibitors: A FAERS Disproportionality Analysis of Amivantamab, Mobocertinib, and Classic Agents
Khan, Z. S.; Nadel, A.; Joly, T. J.
Show abstract
BackgroundEpidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) inhibitors, while effective in oncology, are associated with under-characterized ocular adverse events (AEs). Prior studies have been limited in scope, lacking a comprehensive, class-wide analysis of the full spectrum of ocular toxicity, particularly for newer agents. MethodsWe conducted a disproportionality analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) (2001-2025). Twelve EGFR-targeted agents were evaluated against a pre-specified set of ocular MedDRA Preferred Terms. To ensure robust signal detection, a significant association was defined by [≥]3 co-reported cases, a Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) [≥]2.0, and a false-discovery-rate adjusted p-value <0.05. ResultsAmong 6,976,462 drug-event combinations, 20 met all signal criteria for Eyelash Abnormalities, Ocular Surface Disease, or Vision-Threatening and Intraocular Events. Trichomegaly demonstrated extreme disproportionality (e.g., panitumumab PRR= 465.3, 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 247.7-874.3). A consistent pattern of ocular surface toxicity (conjunctivitis, keratitis, blepharitis) was observed across multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies, indicating a class-wide effect. Signals for serious events included corneal perforation (erlotinib, n= 7, PRR=13.9, 95% CI= 6.6-29.4) and optic neuropathy (erlotinib, n= 6, PRR= 2.9, 95% CI= 1.3-6.4). ConclusionThis analysis confirms a strong, class-wide signal for ocular toxicity across the spectrum of EGFR inhibitors, from characteristic eyelid changes to sight-threatening complications. These findings underscore the necessity for proactive ophthalmologic monitoring, including baseline assessment, in patients receiving these therapies to preserve vision and maintain quality of life during cancer treatment.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Novel Computer-Assisted Drug-Induced Liver Injury Causality Assessment Tool (DILI-CAT) 92%
- A distinct four-value blood signature of pyrexia under combination therapy of malignant melanoma with BRAF/MEK-inhibitors evidenced by an algorithm-defined pyrexia score 91%
- Adverse drug reactions associated with the use of biological agents 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Dupilumab-associated ocular surface disease: incidence, management and long-term sequelae. 91%
- An Open-Source Dataset Of Anti-Vegf Therapy In Diabetic Macular Oedema Patients Over Four Years & Their Visual Outcomes 89%
- Increasing frequency of hospital admissions for retinal detachment and vitreo-retinal surgery in England 2000-2018 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Large-scale empirical identification of candidate comparators for pharmacoepidemiological studies 93%
- Standardization of drug names in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System: The DiAna dictionary 92%
- Preventable deaths involving medicines in England and Wales, 2013-22: a systematic case series of coroners’ reports 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Contextualising Single-Arm Ophthalmology Trials With Real-World Data: An Emulated Target Trial Comparing The Efficacy Of Interventions For Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration 89%
- Risk assessment of drug-induced Long QT Syndrome for some COVID-19 repurposed drugs 88%
- Assessing The Net Financial Benefits Of Employing Digital Endpoints In Clinical Trials 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.