Back

Development of a Deep Learning Based Framework for Classification of Indian Venomous Snakes Integrated with Explainable Artificial Intelligence for primary and emergency care providers

Manna, I. I. A.; Wagle, U.; Balaji, B.; Lath, V.; Sampathila, N.; Sirur, F. M.; Upadya, S.

2026-03-18 emergency medicine
10.64898/2026.03.16.26348471 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundSnakebite envenoming is a significant global health crisis that has been long neglected as a global health priority. It is a huge problem for rural communities of low and middle-income countries, India accounts for the largest proportion of snakebite deaths globally. Timely identification of venomous snakebite and its syndromic pattern is essential for effective administration of antivenom and supportive treatment. Expert identification of snake species and syndromes is not always available in peripheral healthcare settings. This leads to delays, unnecessary referrals, or improper treatment choices. Additionally, diverse snake species distribution and venom variations across regions pose challenges. AI-powered image classification methods can help overcome these barriers. We propose a clinically oriented deep learning pipeline for binary classification of venomous and non-venomous snake species of India using real-world imagery data. This pipeline would serve as a baseline step towards aiding snakebite management at peripheral healthcare setups with scarce resources. MethodsThe selected dataset consisted of 20 medically important Indian species. MobileViT-S, ConvNeXt-Tiny, EfficientNet-V2-S and ResNeXt-50 (32x4d) were trained under same conditions for comparison of results. Model interpretability was evaluated using Grad-CAM ++ to ensure that classification was not performed based on background but on features like head shape and stripes present on body. For reliable implementation we connected it to a web interface with human in loop expert verification. Experts can confirm or override predictions in real time. ResultsAmong the evaluated architectures, ResNeXt-50 (32x4d) showed the most reliable and consistent performance in classifying venomous and non-venomous snakes. It achieved the highest test accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score. The model also had strong discriminative ability, with a ROC-AUC of 0.9950 and PR-AUC of 0.9959. These results indicate dependable performance in safety-critical screening situations. Grad-CAM++ visualizations confirmed that predictions were based on anatomically relevant features, especially in the head and body contour areas. This supports model interpretability and reduces background bias. ConclusionsAlthough the dataset size and single-institution source limit how widely the results can be applied, the proposed framework shows that its possible to create a clinically oriented, ready-to-use deep learning system for snakebite triage support. This system is intended as a scalable tool to help rural healthcare workers, emergency responders, and telemedicine platforms in areas where snakebites are common. Author SummarySnakebite is a major public health concern that disproportionally affects the rural population. Delays in identifying whether a snake is venomous often lead to delayed treatment, unnecessary use of antivenom, or inappropriate referrals. In many rural settings, access to expert snake identification is limited. To address this gap, authors have developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-based image classification system that distinguishes snakes into two clinically relevant categories: venomous or non-venomous. Unlike many previous studies that focused on ideal, high-quality wildlife images, our model was trained using real-world photographs captured in emergency situations, including images taken by patients and field responders under variable lighting and background conditions. This approach improves the models relevance to practical healthcare settings. The system achieved high accuracy and was further strengthened by visual interpretability tools and expert verification to ensure reliability. By combining AI-assisted classification with human oversight, this work provides a scalable decision-support tool that may improve early triage, rational antivenom use, and surveillance in snakebite-endemic regions

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 5%
23.4%
2
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.5%
3
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.4%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 12%
7.1%
5
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.8%
7
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
8
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
9
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
10
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
11
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
12
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
13
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.3%
16
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
17
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
18
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
19
Journal of Pathology Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
20
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
24
Cytometry Part A
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
26
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%
27
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%