Back

Automated Detection and Quantification of Hemorrhagic Transformation After Endovascular Thrombectomy

Ryu, W.-S.; Sunwoo, L.; Lee, M.; Kang, K.; Kim, J. G.; Lee, S. J.; Cha, J.-K.; Park, T. H.; Lee, J.-Y.; Lee, K. B.; Kwon, D. H.; Lee, J.; Park, H.-K.; Hong, K.-S.; Lee, M.; Oh, M.-S.; Yu, K.-H.; Gwak, D.-S.; Kim, D.-E.; Kim, H.; Kim, J.-T.; Kim, J.-G.; Choi, J. C.; Kim, W.-J.; Kwon, J.-H.; Yum, K. S.; Shin, D.-I.; Hong, J.-H.; Sohn, S.-I.; Lee, S.-H.; Kim, C.; Jeong, H.-B.; Park, K.-Y.; Kim, C. K.; Lee, K.-J.; Kang, J.; Kim, J. Y.; Bae, H.-J.; Kim, B. J.

2026-03-17 neurology
10.64898/2026.03.16.26347868 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundHemorrhagic transformation (HT) after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is a principal determinant of clinical outcome. Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms for spontaneous hemorrhage detection exist, but none has been validated for post-procedural HT across multiple imaging modalities. MethodsWe conducted a multicenter diagnostic accuracy study within the Clinical Research Collaboration for Stroke in Korea registry (18 centers, 2022-2023). Patients who underwent EVT and received follow-up NCCT, GRE, or SWI within 168 hours were included. AI-derived hemorrhage volumes were compared against expert-determined ECASS classification. Three-month modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores were evaluated for volume-outcome association. ResultsAmong 1,490 patients (median age 73; 57.4% male), HT was present in 41.4% and parenchymal hemorrhage (PH) in 11.1%. PH detection sensitivity exceeded 94% across all modalities (NCCT 95.4%, GRE 94.4%, SWI 98.3%), with AUCs of 0.900, 0.943, and 0.953, respectively. AI-derived volume correlated with 3-month mRS (Spearman {rho} = 0.353, P < 0.001); good outcome (mRS 0-2) declined from 61.8% to 6.7% across increasing volume categories. Among ECASS 0 cases, AI-positive patients had significantly worse outcomes than true-negatives (good outcome 48.2% vs 67.2%, mortality 10.7% vs 4.6%, P < 0.001). ConclusionsAI-based hemorrhage quantification provides high detection of clinically significant PH after EVT and demonstrates a dose-response association with functional outcome. AI-derived volume may serve as a continuous prognostic biomarker that identifies at-risk subgroups beyond categorical ECASS grading.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
2
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
3
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.4%
5
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
6
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
7
Neurocritical Care
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
8
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.4%
11
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
12
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
13
Med
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
14
Neurology
44 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
15
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
16
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
17
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
18
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
19
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
20
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
22
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
23
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
24
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
25
Annals of Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
26
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
27
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 67%
0.5%
28
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%