Back

Negative allometry of egg size among 29 species of drosophilid flies

Rader, J. A.; Petersen, M. E.; Cortes, D. A.; Matute, D. R.

2026-03-18 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.03.15.711943 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The body size of adults and immature stages are fundamental animal traits that influence animal physiology, ecology, and range distribution. While the importance of egg size has been acknowledged as a proxy of parental investment in animals, little work has addressed the tempo and mode of evolution of egg size and shape. Here, we present a comparative study of this trait using a phylogeny based on genome-wide markers together with measurements of egg size and adult body size from 29 drosophilid species. Our analyses revisit the allometric relationship between egg size and body size and show that egg size scales negatively with respect to adult size, even after accounting for shared evolutionary history. In other words, larger species tend to produce proportionally smaller eggs. We also detect a moderate phylogenetic signal in both egg size and egg shape, indicating that closely related species resemble each other in these traits. Model comparisons show that the evolution of egg morphology in drosophilids is best described by gradual divergence through time driven by stochastic evolutionary change. This pattern contrasts with findings from other animal groups, including birds, cephalopods, and reptiles, where alternative evolutionary models better explain trait evolution. Together, these results suggest that the evolutionary dynamics shaping egg morphology in drosophilids differ from those operating in other major lineages and underscore the importance of comparative analyses of early developmental traits across taxa.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.0%
2
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.9%
3
Evolution Letters
71 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.9%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 7%
8.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.2%
6
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.7%
7
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.9%
8
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.2%
9
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.0%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
11
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
12
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
13
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
14
Biology Letters
66 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
15
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
16
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
17
Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
18
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
20
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
21
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.7%
22
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
24
Genome Biology and Evolution
280 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 79%
0.6%
26
Genome Research
409 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%