Back

Heightened Distraction under Competition in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

McCain, K. J.; Ayomen, E.; Mirifar, A.; Simpson Martin, H.; Demeterfi, D.; McNeil, D. J.; DePamphilis, G.; Hatem, R.; Nelson, R.; Melville, G.; Hammes, E.; Lee, A.; McCarty, R.; Lee, M.; Paciotti, C.; Coutinho, P.; Mathews, C. A.; Keil, A.

2026-03-17 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.03.15.711932 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The identification of objective, dimensional indices of mental health is of central importance in the pursuit of transdiagnostic multi-dimensional frameworks of psychopathology. Altered visual processing occupies a specific domain of interest and motivated the present investigation aimed to quantify the visuocortical impact of affective naturalistic distractor cues on limited capacity attentional resources in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). The current investigation examined the extent to which attentional resources are allocated toward task cues under affective and disorder-relevant distraction in participants with OCD (N = 33) and control participants (N = 31). Steady-state visual evoked potentials (ssVEPs) in response to task-relevant cues were examined using a foreground task where participants detected coherent motion in a flickering random dot kinematogram (RDK) overlaid on naturalistic distractor pictures ranging in emotional content (pleasant, neutral, unpleasant, and OCD-evoking pictures). Amplitude envelopes of ssVEPs in response to the motion stimulus served as an index of visuocortical engagement with task-relevant cues. Data were also fitted to the distraction under competition model (DUC), a computational framework of attention selection. Group differences emerged with stronger visuocortical competition effects (attenuated task engagement) for the OCD group, driven largely by the unpleasant pictures, followed by the OCD-evoking pictures. Furthermore, the DUC model fit well in both groups, demonstrated the dominance of the visuocortical competition observed in response to the unpleasant pictures, and revealed the presence of substantial competition in response to the OCD-evoking pictures in the OCD group.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
2
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
10.1%
3
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.2%
4
Psychophysiology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
5
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
6
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.6%
8
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
9
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
50% of probability mass above
11
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.9%
13
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
17
Schizophrenia Research
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
18
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
19
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.2%
21
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
22
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
23
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
24
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
25
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
26
International Journal of Psychophysiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
27
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
36 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
28
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
29
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
30
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%