Back

Diverse lung challenges elicit a conserved monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation blueprint

Iliakis, C.; T'Jonck, W.; Mouat, I. C.; Bankole, S.; Liang, J.; Jones, G.-R.; Kulikauskaite, J.; Burgess, M. O.; Janas, P.; Crotta, S.; Priestnall, S.; Suarez-Bonnet, A.; Schwarze, J.; Wack, A.; Bain, C. C.

2026-03-17 immunology
10.64898/2026.03.15.711867 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Alveolar macrophages (AM) form a first line of defence to lung insults. These insults often lead to replacement of foetal-derived tissue-resident AMs (fAMs) by monocyte-derived AMs (mono-AMs) with different functionality, which impacts lung immunity long-term. However, whether these alterations are conserved or insult-specific is not well understood. Here, we show that respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection remodels the AM compartment long-term. We perform comparative analyses of fAMs and mono-AMs after RSV infection, influenza (IAV) infection and clodronate liposome administration to derive rules governing the functional and transcriptional changes in AM across insults. We identify a crucial tissue integration checkpoint of CD11b+ mono-AMs which involves acquisition of proliferative capacity and requires EGR2-mediated transcriptional rewiring. Mono-AMs elicited by RSV, influenza or clodronate liposomes have a hard-wired ontogeny-dependent stereotypical profile of transcription, metabolism and enhanced immunoreactivity despite a substantially different inflammatory environment during differentiation; accordingly, mono-AMs, whether elicited by infection or sterile depletion, protect from subsequent S. pneumoniae infection. By contrast, fAMs are more susceptible to subtle, context-dependent transcriptional alterations. Our findings highlight that long-term changes in the AM compartment show origin-dependent phenotypic divergence and that mono-AM integration follows a hard-wired trajectory fine-tuned by environmental factors.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.