Back

Higher Magnetic Field NMR Renders Resolution Enhancement on Ganglioside GD3 Catalyzed Abeta42 Aggregates

Saha, J.; Ravula, T.; Ramamoorthy, A.

2026-03-18 biophysics
10.64898/2026.03.15.711644 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Magic-angle spinning (MAS) solid-state NMR (SSNMR) has been widely used to determine amyloid fibril structures at atomic resolution. Such studies typically rely on homogeneous fibril preparations that produce narrow linewidths and high spectral resolution, enabling reliable resonance assignment and structural analysis. However, many biologically relevant amyloid aggregates are structurally heterogeneous, resulting in spectral broadening and reduced sensitivity that hinder atomic-resolution characterization. Lipids are known to modulate amyloid aggregation pathways and promote the formation of toxic species that are often less homogeneous, further complicating NMR-based investigations. Here, we evaluate the feasibility of utilizing the benefits associated with high-field (1.1 GHz) SSNMR for studying ganglioside GD3-catalyzed A{beta}42 aggregates. Uniformly-13C,15N-labeled A{beta}42 was incubated with GD3 to generate lipid-associated aggregates and analyzed under MAS conditions. 13C cross-polarization magic-angle spinning (CPMAS) spectra and 2D 13C-13C chemical shift correlation experiments using CORD (COmbined R2nv-Driven) mixing were acquired and compared with data collected at 600 MHz. Despite the heterogeneous nature of the GM1-associated assemblies, the 1.1 GHz spectra exhibit enhanced sensitivity and improved spectral resolution. Better resolved resonances corresponding to selectively structured regions of A{beta}42 are observed, indicating the presence of an ordered core within the lipid-associated aggregates. These results demonstrate that ultrahigh-field SSNMR significantly improves the characterization of heterogeneous amyloid assemblies and provides a promising approach for atomic-level investigation of biologically relevant, lipid-modulated A{beta} aggregates.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
10.6%
2
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.3%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
4
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
5
Chemistry – A European Journal
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
6
Chemical Communications
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
7
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.7%
8
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.3%
9
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 35%
2.1%
11
Nanoscale Advances
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
12
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
JACS Au
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
14
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
15
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.8%
16
Langmuir
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
18
Analytical Biochemistry
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
19
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
20
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.4%
21
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
72 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
22
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
23
Biophysical Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
24
Communications Chemistry
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
25
NMR in Biomedicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
26
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
28
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
29
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
30
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%