Back

Single-cell RNA editing defines clinically relevant cellular states in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia

Wickramasinghe, N.; Bui, D.; Neupane, S.; Ferrall-Fairbanks, M.; Deininger, M.; Padron, E.; Gu, T.

2026-03-18 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.03.15.711339 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundChronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a clinically heterogeneous myeloid malignancy with limited therapeutic options and suboptimal risk stratification. Although single-cell RNA sequencing has refined disease classification through gene expression profiling, post-transcriptional mechanisms--particularly adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing--remain unexplored at single-cell resolution. We hypothesized that cell-specific RNA editing programs contribute to CMML heterogeneity and define distinct, clinically actionable cellular states in CMML. MethodsWe developed a single-cell-aware computational framework for high-confidence identification and quantification of RNA editing events. Candidate sites were detected at pseudo-bulk depth using stringent filters and subsequently quantified at single-cell resolution. The pipeline incorporated dual alignment, barcode correction, artifact removal, and exclusion of genomic variants to ensure specificity. We applied this framework to discovery and independent validation CMML cohorts. Editing-defined cellular states were identified by unsupervised clustering of single-cell editing profiles and evaluated for associations with clinical stage, TET2 status, survival, and response to hypomethylating agent (HMA) therapy. Regulatory mechanisms were assessed by analyzing ADAR1/ADAR2 expression and relationships between editing levels and target gene expression. ResultsWe identified 3,326 high-confidence A-to-I RNA editing sites and delineated reproducible editing-defined cellular states. A granulocyte-monocyte progenitor-like editing state (edClu1_sub0) aligned with an inflammatory, monocytic-biased transcriptional program and was significantly associated with adverse survival, advanced-stage disease and TET2-mutant CMML, supporting it as a high-risk biomarker-defined subpopulation. In contrast, states such as edClu3 and edClu6 were enriched in earlier-stage, TET2-wild-type CMML and correlated with improved outcomes. Editing-defined states demonstrated systematic remodeling following HMA therapy, indicating treatment-responsive post-transcriptional programs. The high-risk state exhibited elevated ADAR1 and reduced ADAR2 expression, suggesting enzyme-specific regulatory imbalance as a potential therapeutic vulnerability. Integrative analyses further nominated immune-related genes--including LAPTM5, CTSS, and CD83--as CMML-specific oncogenic RNA editing targets, with coordinated increases in editing and expression within the aggressive state. ConclusionsRNA editing represents a clinically informative and mechanistically relevant layer that refines CMML stratification at single-cell resolution, independent of gene expression. These findings provide a framework for integrating post-transcriptional regulation into precision oncology and highlight RNA editing signatures as biomarkers for risk assessment, treatment monitoring, and therapeutic targeting in hematologic malignancies.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Leukemia
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.8%
2
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
8.2%
3
Blood
67 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.0%
4
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.0%
5
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
6
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
8
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.5%
9
Neuro-Oncology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
10
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.0%
11
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
12
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
13
Blood Cancer Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
14
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
15
Clinical Epigenetics
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.6%
16
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
17
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
18
Haematologica
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
19
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
20
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
21
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.9%
22
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
23
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.7%
25
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.7%
26
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.7%
27
Molecular Cancer
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
29
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.6%