Back

Identification of the Phytophthora PAMP Pep-13 Receptor Using Diploid Potato Inbred Lines

Fan, X.; Li, D.; Cheng, L.; Zhu, Y.; Han, Y.; Zhang, C.; Huang, S.; Sun, T.

2026-03-16 plant biology
10.64898/2026.03.15.709221 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Plants employ cell surface receptors to recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and activate pattern-triggered immunity, a crucial defense mechanism against invading pathogens. Pep-13 is a PAMP derived from a class of conserved cell wall transglutaminases present in Phytophthora species, and its receptor PERU was reported recently. In our parallel study, we observed distinct responses to Pep-13 between two diploid potato inbred lines: E454 recognizes Pep-13, whereas A018 does not. Genetic analysis demonstrated that Pep-13 recognition in E454 is controlled by a single genetic locus, tentatively designated TGER (Transglutaminase elicitor response). Through bulked segregant analysis sequencing, followed by complementation assays, we found that the TGERa gene in E454 is essential for Pep-13 recognition. Sequence alignment revealed that TGERa shares 99.91% amino acid sequence identity with PERU, indicating that TGERa and PERU are allelic variants of the same gene (PERU/TGERa). TGERb, a highly homologous gene of TGERa, was identified in the E454 genome; notably, TGERa, but not TGERb, can recognize Pep-13. We further demonstrated that TGERb exhibits defects in both ligand binding and association with the co-receptor StSERK3A. Additionally, we found that the TGERa allele in A018 is a weak allele with reduced expression levels, presumably resulting from a 3 kb DNA fragment insertion in its first intron. Heterologous introduction of TGERa into Nicotiana benthamiana and tomato significantly enhanced their resistance to Phytophthora infestans. Collectively, our findings confirm that PERU/TGERa functions as the Pep-13 receptor in potato and provide a valuable molecular target for improving Phytophthora resistance in plants.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.0%
2
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
10.0%
3
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.3%
4
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
55 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
5
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.2%
6
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.8%
7
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
8
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.8%
9
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.5%
11
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
12
Molecular Plant
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 30%
3.0%
14
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.0%
15
Molecular Plant Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.6%
17
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.3%
19
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.3%
20
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
21
Plant Science
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
22
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
23
Journal of Integrative Plant Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
24
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.9%
25
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
26
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.8%
27
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
28
Nature Plants
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%