Back

Midbrain Tet1 dosage defines inter-individual binge-eating susceptibility

Pospisilik, J. A.; Gruber, T.; Chesters, R. A.; Fagnocchi, L.; Yu, X.; Fu, Z.; Gallik, K.; Backes, H.; Vaughan, R.; Huber, M.; De Angelis, M.; Gullmets, J.; Dykstra, H.; Apostle, S.; Cook, T.; Kulchycki, J.; DeCamp, L.; Mueller, T. D.; Timper, K.; Desrivieres, S.; Lippert, R. N.

2026-03-17 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.03.14.711800 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Binge-eating disorder (BED) is the most common eating disorder worldwide and carries life-altering comorbidities. While genetic and environmental risk factors have been identified, the mechanisms that determine inter-individual susceptibility to BED remain largely unknown. Here, we demonstrate that developmental dosage of the DNA hydroxymethylase Tet1 defines stable inter-individual differences in binge-eating susceptibility. In mice, midbrain dopaminergic neurons of the ventral tegmental area (VTADA) are essential for the induction of addictive binge-eating behavior, express high levels of Tet1, and undergo rapid and widespread DNA hydroxymethylation remodeling upon experimental binge eating. Strikingly, Tet1 haplo-insufficiency creates pronounced inter-individual variation in binge-eating susceptibility even among genetically identical mice, which we trace to reduced connectivity between the prelimbic medial prefrontal cortex (mPFCPL) and the VTA. Chemogenetic inhibition of mPFCPL[->]VTA projections reduces binge-eating susceptibility, whereas EGR1-guided re-activation of TET1 in VTA dopaminergic neurons restores susceptibility, supporting a causal role for this axis. Importantly, TET1 promoter methylation in patients associates with binge-eating behavior and reward-circuit function, suggesting conservation of this regulatory network in humans. Collectively, these findings identify Tet1 dosage as a novel regulator of binge-eating susceptibility and provide a mechanistic basis for how inter-individual differences in behavior are established.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.